Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2008

63.9% pass rate

from 169 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

22% fail on Brakes (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 20% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 0.59% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
  - 6.5% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 6.5% fail on Rbt (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      - 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      - 0.59% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      - 0.59% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
    - 4.7% fail on Rbt
      - 4.1% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.59% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 6.5% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 5.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Electronic stability control (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 0.59% fail on Electronic braking system
- 4.1% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
    - 3.6% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.59% fail on Pedal
12% fail on Suspension
- 9.5% fail on Suspension arms (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 4.7% fail on Ball joint
  - 4.1% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 1.2% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.2% fail on Springs (80% better than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Coil springs (80% better than other 2008 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Coil spring (80% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.59% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.59% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.59% fail on Suspension rods
  - 0.59% fail on Ball joint
8.3% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.8% fail on Position lamps (9 times worse than other 2008 cars)
  - 1.8% fail on Position lamp (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.8% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.59% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.59% fail on Headlamp
- 0.59% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.59% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.59% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.59% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.59% fail on Horn
4.7% fail on Steering
- 4.7% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 4.7% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
3.0% fail on Tyres
- 2.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.59% fail on Condition
2.4% fail on Visibility
- 1.8% fail on Wipers
- 0.59% fail on Washers
1.8% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.8% fail on Registration plates
1.8% fail on Road Wheels
- 1.8% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
1.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 0.59% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  - 0.59% fail on Compression ignition
    - 0.59% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.59% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 0.59% fail on Engine oil leaks
0.59% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.59% fail on Exhaust system