Chrysler 300C MOT Results

Registered in 2006
65.6% pass rate
from 398 tests in 2020
(21% better than other 2006 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2006 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300C is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (69% worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 18% fail on Brake performance (190% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 16% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 6.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 5.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.25% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.25% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.25% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.25% fail on Service brake performance
    • 2.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 2.3% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 2.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.25% fail on Lever
    • 0.50% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.50% fail on Lever
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
    • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.25% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.25% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (67% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.75% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.25% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (74% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Outline marker lamps
      • 0.25% fail on Outline marker lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.25% fail on Horn
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (94% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.3% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.0% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.75% fail on Sub-frame (4 times worse than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.75% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Coil springs (82% better than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.75% fail on Coil spring (82% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Anti-roll bars (90% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 4.0% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 4.0% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.25% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.25% fail on Universal joint
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2006 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.25% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (49% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 1.8% fail on Condition
  • 2.5% fail on Visibility (63% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.75% fail on Washers (77% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.25% fail on Window
  • 1.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.0% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.25% fail on Requirements
    • 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plates
  • 1.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (86% better than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Transmission (85% better than other 2006 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.50% fail on Flexible couplings (55 times worse than other 2006 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on Pipe
  • 0.75% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.50% fail on Attachment
    • 0.25% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages