Chrysler 300 MOT Results

Registered in 2009

63.6% pass rate

from 99 tests in 2021

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chrysler 300 is unusually good or bad.

18% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 12% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 10% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 4.0% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
    - 2.0% fail on Rbt
      - 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
  - 1.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 3.0% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 3.0% fail on Brake discs
  - 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 2.0% fail on Brake pads
- 2.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 2.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control
14% fail on Suspension
- 9.1% fail on Suspension arms
  - 6.1% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Ball joint
  - 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 2.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Axles
  - 1.0% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.0% fail on Other suspension component
  - 1.0% fail on Ball joint
  - 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamps
  - 4.0% fail on Headlamp
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.0% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 1.0% fail on Battery(ies)
9.1% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 9.1% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 9.1% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
6.1% fail on Tyres
- 4.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
5.1% fail on Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 1.0% fail on Condition of glass
  - 1.0% fail on Windscreen
4.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 3.0% fail on Compression ignition
    - 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 1.0% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 1.0% fail on Catalytic converter
- 1.0% fail on Fluid leaks
  - 1.0% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
3.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
1.0% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.0% fail on Seat belts
  - 1.0% fail on Condition
1.0% fail on Road Wheels
- 1.0% fail on Condition