Chevrolet Tacuma MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.7% pass rate
from 797 tests in 2017
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Tacuma is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 7.0% fail on Front lamps (41% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear lamps
    • 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim (45% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.50% fail on Direction indicators (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Flashing type (83% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Individual lamps (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 7.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (51% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.63% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 5.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 4.0% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Component mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 0.25% fail on Spring mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.1% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.1% fail on Constant velocity joints
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.63% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.50% fail on Front
      • 0.13% fail on Rear
    • 0.50% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Shock absorbers (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Condition (82% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.13% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.13% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 18% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Components (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Pipes (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.50% fail on Leaks
      • 0.38% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.1% fail on Front wheels (95% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.75% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance (83% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.25% fail on Wheel cylinder (17 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake drums
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (50% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.38% fail on Mirrors
  • 11% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Seat belts (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Prescribed areas (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment
    • 1.3% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.38% fail on Size/type
    • 0.13% fail on Valve stem
  • 8.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Emissions (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.88% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.63% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.13% fail on Tank
      • 0.13% fail on Hose
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe
  • 3.0% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 2.0% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.25% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.0% fail on Power steering (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Operation
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.25% fail on Rams (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Other components
    • 0.13% fail on Steering operation
  • 2.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.5% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.50% fail on Chassis
  • 0.88% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.25% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages