Chevrolet Spark MOT Results
Registered in 201252.3% pass rate
from 4,079 tests in 2021
(57% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Spark is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
12% fail on
Service brake performance
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 11% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Plate brake tester
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Decelerometer
(5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (12 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
(14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Service brake imbalance (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.98% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.54% fail on Brake performance not tested (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
- 0.20% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.074% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.025% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt
-
12% fail on
Service brake performance
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (15 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.0% fail on Brake pads
-
0.86% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.86% fail on Brake discs
-
2.0% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(99% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Hand lever (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pedal
-
0.37% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.27% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.15% fail on Lever
- 0.074% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.049% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.025% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.025% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.025% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.025% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Additional braking device
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(95% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Stop lamp (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Headlamps
(92% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Headlamp (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Direction indicators
(60% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.15% fail on Individual direction indicators (84% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.025% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.66% fail on
Flashing type
(60% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.25% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.12% fail on Horn
- 0.074% fail on Electrical wiring (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Rear reflectors
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(21% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(57% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
(57% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Coil spring (57% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Mounting
-
6.8% fail on
Coil springs
(57% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Wheel bearings (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
(50% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Ball joint (41% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (61% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.025% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers (85% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Macpherson strut
(10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.66% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.074% fail on Ball joint
- 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.025% fail on Linkage
-
0.074% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.049% fail on Other suspension component (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.049% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.025% fail on
Axles
- 0.025% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.025% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.025% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.025% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.025% fail on Other components
-
6.8% fail on
Springs
(57% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Visibility
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Wipers (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Washers
- 1.5% fail on Bonnet (22 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
View to rear
- 0.12% fail on Mirrors
- 0.049% fail on Driver's view
-
0.049% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.049% fail on Windscreen
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
(22% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (55% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 0.074% fail on Size/type
-
4.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(72% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Transmission
-
0.71% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.71% fail on Joints
-
0.71% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.22% fail on Bumpers (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Engine mounting
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Bracket (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Body
- 0.074% fail on Other body component
- 0.025% fail on Panel
-
0.074% fail on
Boot lid
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.025% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.025% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.025% fail on Hose
-
0.025% fail on
Load security
-
0.025% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.025% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.025% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.025% fail on
Doors
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.025% fail on Door condition
-
0.025% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.025% fail on
Seats
- 0.025% fail on Passenger's seat
-
2.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.59% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.025% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.025% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.025% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.098% fail on
Compression ignition
(86% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
0.025% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.025% fail on Catalytic converter
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.39% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.025% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.025% fail on Sound deadening material
-
1.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(56% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.025% fail on Requirements
- 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.025% fail on
Airbags
- 0.025% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.64% fail on
Seat belts
(130% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.98% fail on
Steering
(37% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.88% fail on Track rod end
- 0.025% fail on Ball joint
-
0.049% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.049% fail on Steering rack
-
0.025% fail on
Power steering
- 0.025% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.91% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.51% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.51% fail on Registration plates
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
(67% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Attachment (74% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Spark (2010 - 2015)
Enjoyable and easy to drive. Easy to get in and out of. Decent engines. Good rear space. Good ride quality.