Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2013
73.0% pass rate
from 911 tests in 2017
(60% worse than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (160% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Registration plate lamp (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.44% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.44% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.11% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 5.0% fail on Brakes (78% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Hub components (110% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.55% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Anti-slip (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Components
        • 0.11% fail on Pipes
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
  • 4.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.22% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.22% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.8% fail on Suspension
    • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (160% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.22% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.22% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.22% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.22% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.11% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.11% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 0.88% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering control (62 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering wheel (204 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Steering column
    • 0.44% fail on Steering system
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (15 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Free play
        • 0.11% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end
  • 0.55% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.55% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
  • 0.11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.11% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.11% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.11% fail on Pipe
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages