Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2013
63.2% pass rate
from 1,012 tests in 2020
(61% worse than other 2013 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (91% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Position lamps (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (67% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.20% fail on All direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.5% fail on Tyres (68% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (79% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Condition (67% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  • 8.1% fail on Suspension (90% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.20% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.099% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.20% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.099% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.099% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.099% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes (82% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Brake linings
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.89% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.20% fail on Rbt
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.20% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.099% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.099% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.099% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.20% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.20% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (5 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.099% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.099% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.099% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.099% fail on Lever
    • 0.099% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.099% fail on Brake fluid
  • 7.1% fail on Visibility (71% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 0.49% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (6 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.79% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested (12 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.099% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.099% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 1.5% fail on Spark ignition (140% worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.099% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other leaks (22 times worse than other 2013 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.69% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.099% fail on Pipe
      • 0.099% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.099% fail on System
    • 0.20% fail on Transmission
      • 0.20% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.20% fail on Joints
    • 0.20% fail on Seats
      • 0.20% fail on Passenger's seat (13 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.49% fail on Attachment
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.20% fail on Steering
    • 0.099% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.099% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.099% fail on Steering wheel
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages