Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2013

60.9% pass rate

from 948 tests in 2021

(38% worse than other 2013 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2013 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (67% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamps
  - 3.1% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.32% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.0% fail on Direction indicators (130% worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 2.0% fail on Flashing type (130% worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 0.63% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.32% fail on All direction indicators (7 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.84% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 0.84% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.32% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.21% fail on Electrical wiring (16 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.21% fail on Position lamps
  - 0.21% fail on Position lamp
- 0.11% fail on Rear reflectors
12% fail on Suspension (62% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 11% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 11% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 11% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2013 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.42% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.21% fail on Linkage
  - 0.21% fail on Linkage ball joints
  - 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.11% fail on Ball joint
7.6% fail on Tyres (48% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Tread depth (66% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 0.21% fail on Size/type
6.9% fail on Brakes
- 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (96% worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on Brake linings and pads (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 4.9% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 0.11% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.63% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 0.63% fail on Brake discs
  - 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.11% fail on Cable
- 1.7% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
    - 0.95% fail on Rbt
      - 0.84% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
    - 0.11% fail on Decelerometer
      - 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.63% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 0.63% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.32% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.32% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      - 0.11% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.21% fail on Brake performance not tested
  - 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 0.21% fail on Rbt
      - 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.42% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  - 0.32% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.21% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.21% fail on Lever
- 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.11% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
  - 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
5.8% fail on Visibility
- 3.8% fail on Wipers (73% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 0.11% fail on Driver's view
4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (160% worse than other 2013 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (170% worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 2.2% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 0.42% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 0.42% fail on Emissions not tested
    - 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.11% fail on Other emission control equipment
  - 2.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (4 times worse than other 2013 cars)
    - 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    - 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.11% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.11% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    - 0.11% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 0.42% fail on Transmission
  - 0.42% fail on Drive shafts
    - 0.42% fail on Joints
- 0.32% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.32% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.21% fail on Pipe (14 times worse than other 2013 cars)
  - 0.11% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers
- 0.11% fail on Towbar
  - 0.11% fail on Other towbar components
- 0.11% fail on Undertray
0.63% fail on Steering
- 0.42% fail on Steering wheel (148 times worse than other 2013 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Steering linkage components (82% better than other 2013 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on Track rod end (81% better than other 2013 cars)
0.53% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.42% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.42% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
0.42% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
- 0.11% fail on Condition
0.21% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.21% fail on Registration plates

Read the Honest John Review

Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.