Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2012
61.5% pass rate
from 2,524 tests in 2020
(46% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (80% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim (36% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.12% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.59% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Reversing lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.12% fail on Horn
    • 0.12% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.079% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.040% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.040% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.12% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.040% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.040% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Suspension (72% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 9.7% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.040% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension arms (62% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint (59% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (86% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Axles
      • 0.040% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.040% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.040% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.040% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.040% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (81% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 5.3% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.36% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.040% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.040% fail on Cable
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (93% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.79% fail on Rbt
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.16% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.040% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.079% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.44% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.24% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.079% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.16% fail on Lever
    • 0.12% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.040% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.040% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.040% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.040% fail on Other components
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres (28% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition (37% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility (45% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers (77% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.079% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.079% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.079% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.079% fail on View to rear
      • 0.079% fail on Mirrors
  • 5.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.079% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.079% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 2.1% fail on Spark ignition (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.040% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.040% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.040% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.40% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.079% fail on Other leaks
  • 1.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.67% fail on Transmission
      • 0.59% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.59% fail on Joints
      • 0.079% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.079% fail on Joints
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.32% fail on Doors (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Other passenger's door (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Door condition (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.040% fail on Catch
      • 0.040% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.040% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Body
      • 0.12% fail on Other body component
      • 0.040% fail on Panel
    • 0.079% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.079% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.079% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.040% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.040% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.040% fail on Undertray
  • 0.87% fail on Steering
    • 0.48% fail on Steering wheel (96 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering linkage components (70% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Track rod end (68% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Other components (17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Steering column
  • 0.59% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.52% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
      • 0.040% fail on Requirements
    • 0.079% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages