MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Orlando » 2012

Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2012
58.9% pass rate
from 2,260 tests in 2021
(36% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Side repeaters (150% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.088% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Position lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.18% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.088% fail on Horn
      • 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.044% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (41% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 12% fail on Springs (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 12% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 12% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (78% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.088% fail on Linkage
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.53% fail on Suspension arms (83% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.088% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.088% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.044% fail on Axles
      • 0.044% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (85% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on Brake linings (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.58% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.27% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Cable (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Linkage
    • 3.7% fail on Brake performance (42% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.75% fail on Parking brake performance (92% worse than other 2012 cars)
          • 0.27% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.49% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.35% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.13% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.18% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.18% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.088% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.044% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.7% fail on Visibility (72% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.088% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.044% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.044% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Compression ignition (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (15 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.84% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.088% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.088% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (10 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 2.7% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.53% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested (170% worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.27% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.22% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.044% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.75% fail on Transmission
      • 0.75% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.75% fail on Joints
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition
      • 0.044% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Boot lid condition (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.088% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.044% fail on Body
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component
  • 1.0% fail on Steering
    • 0.40% fail on Steering wheel (74 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.044% fail on Steering box
    • 0.18% fail on Steering linkage components (87% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Operation (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.088% fail on Steering play
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.044% fail on Steering column
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.35% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
    • 0.044% fail on Hubs
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.35% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.27% fail on Condition
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment
    • 0.044% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.044% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.044% fail on Doors
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages