MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Orlando » 2011

Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2011
57.3% pass rate
from 1,565 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (40% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (200% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Direction indicators (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Flashing type (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on All direction indicators (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.19% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.064% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.064% fail on Switch
    • 0.064% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.064% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 11% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms (69% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint (75% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (92% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (59% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Linkage
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints (69% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (84% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.064% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (83% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.96% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.96% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.13% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.064% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.38% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.064% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.064% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.064% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.064% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.89% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.77% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.13% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.064% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.064% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.064% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Compression ignition (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.064% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.45% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.19% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.19% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 7.6% fail on Tyres (29% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (46% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure (59% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission (76% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Drive shafts (73% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Joints (75% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.70% fail on Doors (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Other passenger's door (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Door condition (11 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.064% fail on Door condition
    • 0.19% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.13% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Tank
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other boot lid component (55 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.064% fail on Body
      • 0.064% fail on Panel
  • 0.89% fail on Identification of the vehicle (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.89% fail on Registration plates (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.64% fail on Steering (66% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Steering linkage components (75% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Track rod end (82% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 0.064% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.064% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.064% fail on Steering play
      • 0.064% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.51% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.064% fail on Attachment
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.45% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages