Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results

Registered in 2011
59.3% pass rate
from 1,583 tests in 2020
(30% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Direction indicators (88% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Flashing type (88% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on All direction indicators (10 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on Side repeaters (35% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim (12% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim (17% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (46% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp (8.3% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps (15% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp (9.4% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (91% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Reversing lamps (97% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Position lamp (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (69% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Electrical equipment (60% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.063% fail on Horn
    • 0.063% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers (57% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Suspension arms (86% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (71% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Anti-roll bars (82% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (81% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (55% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage
      • 0.063% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component (9.0% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.063% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 9.2% fail on Brakes (39% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (150% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 5.9% fail on Brake pads (150% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (1.8% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (2.2% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (9.9% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (9.4% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (17% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Service brake performance (39% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.82% fail on Rbt (42% better than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.76% fail on Service brake performance (37% better than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (56% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.88% fail on Parking brake performance (76% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Rbt (84% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance (63% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (53% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Rbt (sp) (51% better than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (25% better than other 2011 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.63% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Pedal
    • 0.32% fail on Parking brake control (15% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Lever (37% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (57% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (24% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Size/type
  • 7.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (60% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.063% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 3.3% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.88% fail on Catalyst emissions (76% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 6.3% fail on Visibility (38% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (84% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (1.9% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.063% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.063% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.063% fail on View to rear
      • 0.063% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (50% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Joints (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Exhaust system (35% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Doors (35% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other passenger's door (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Door condition (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Door condition
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system (12% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Pipe
      • 0.063% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.13% fail on Body (79% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Panel
      • 0.063% fail on Other body component
    • 0.063% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.063% fail on Towbar
      • 0.063% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.063% fail on Seats
      • 0.063% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.063% fail on Undertray
  • 0.88% fail on Identification of the vehicle (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.88% fail on Registration plates (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.57% fail on Steering (62% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Steering gear (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Steering rack (82% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Operation
    • 0.13% fail on Steering linkage components (90% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (89% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.063% fail on Power steering
      • 0.063% fail on Other components
    • 0.063% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.51% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (23% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts (3.2% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (31% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Attachment
      • 0.063% fail on Requirements
    • 0.19% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (45% better than other 2011 cars)
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels (0.54% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Attachment (37% worse than other 2011 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
    Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.

    Search Good Garages