Chevrolet Orlando MOT Results
Registered in 201161.1% pass rate
from 1,523 tests in 2017
(57% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Orlando is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(78% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 8.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Position lamps
(140% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.85% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.066% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.20% fail on Rear reflectors (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Horn
-
0.066% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.066% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.066% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
15% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 15% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Location
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Front drive shafts
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension arms
(72% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2011 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(79% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.066% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.13% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.13% fail on
Shock absorbers
(84% better than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (84% better than other 2011 cars)
-
15% fail on
Coil springs
(5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Brakes
(88% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Hub components
(150% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Brake pads (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Brake discs
- 0.13% fail on Brake linings (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.72% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.59% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.13% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.066% fail on Front wheels
- 0.066% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.72% fail on
Parking brake
(160% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.13% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.13% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.13% fail on
Components
- 0.066% fail on Pipes
- 0.066% fail on Hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Components
- 0.13% fail on ABS
-
6.7% fail on
Hub components
(150% worse than other 2011 cars)
-
8.1% fail on
Tyres
(28% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Tread depth (37% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Condition
- 0.066% fail on Valve stem
-
6.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(39% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Wipers (67% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.66% fail on Windscreen
- 0.33% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(100% worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.53% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.13% fail on System
- 0.066% fail on Pipe
- 0.066% fail on Cap
-
0.72% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.72% fail on Registration plate
-
0.33% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
- 0.13% fail on Passengers other
-
0.066% fail on
Load security
- 0.066% fail on Tailgate
-
0.26% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.13% fail on Condition
- 0.066% fail on Requirements
-
0.066% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.066% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.20% fail on
Steering
-
0.13% fail on
Steering system
- 0.066% fail on Ball joint
- 0.066% fail on Track rod end
-
0.066% fail on
Power steering
- 0.066% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.13% fail on
Steering system
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.20% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Orlando (2011 - 2015)
Seven seats as standard. Easy and comfortable to drive. Decent value and well equipped. Five year/100,000 mile warranty. Chain-cam diesel engine.