MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Matiz » 2010

Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.1% pass rate
from 1,401 tests in 2020
(31% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Position lamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on All position lamps
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Switch (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.071% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.00% fail on Electrical equipment (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Direction indicators (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Flashing type (61% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.71% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.57% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 15% fail on Suspension (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Suspension arms (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.4% fail on Macpherson strut (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Pins and bushes (48 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other suspension component (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.64% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.43% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Anti-roll bar (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.071% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.071% fail on Springs
      • 0.071% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.071% fail on Mounting
  • 14% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.071% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.071% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt
          • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.14% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.57% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.57% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.071% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.071% fail on Lever
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pedal (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.29% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.29% fail on Lever
    • 0.071% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.071% fail on Operation
    • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.071% fail on Servos
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.71% fail on Bonnet (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.071% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.071% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on System (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Pipe (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Hose
    • 0.64% fail on Transmission
      • 0.57% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.57% fail on Joints
      • 0.071% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.071% fail on Joints
    • 0.21% fail on Engine mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.071% fail on Bracket
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
    • 0.071% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.071% fail on Undertray
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.0% fail on Spark ignition (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.071% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.071% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.21% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.071% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.1% fail on Steering
    • 0.86% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.79% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.071% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.71% fail on Steering gear (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Power steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Operation
      • 0.071% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 0.43% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.36% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.21% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 0.36% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages