Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.7% pass rate
from 5,839 tests in 2020
(17% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.9% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.017% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (32% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (29% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (66% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (82% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.10% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.017% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.017% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Mechanical brake components (21% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums (36% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Brake discs (38% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.051% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.034% fail on Lever
        • 0.017% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 2.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.6% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.51% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.51% fail on Lever (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.051% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.051% fail on Servos (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.017% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.069% fail on Air and vacuum systems (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Servos (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Operation
    • 0.034% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.017% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.017% fail on Other components
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (9.7% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.034% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.10% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Switch
    • 0.87% fail on Direction indicators (51% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Flashing type (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Individual direction indicators (46% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters (54% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.017% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.72% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (67% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Electrical equipment (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Horn
      • 0.33% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.017% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.017% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 14% fail on Suspension (11% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Suspension arms (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes (90% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Suspension arm
    • 4.1% fail on Wheel bearings (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Macpherson strut (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Pins and bushes (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.65% fail on Other suspension component (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.017% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.21% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.034% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.017% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 0.14% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Coil spring (98% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Mounting
    • 0.069% fail on Axles
      • 0.069% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.069% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.051% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.017% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.069% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.017% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.017% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 8.5% fail on Visibility (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.086% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.017% fail on View to rear
      • 0.017% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.1% fail on Tyres (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.7% fail on Tread depth (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.29% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on System (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pipe (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.034% fail on Tank
      • 0.017% fail on Hose
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.086% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.086% fail on Door condition
      • 0.051% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.051% fail on Door condition
      • 0.034% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.034% fail on Door condition
    • 0.12% fail on Engine mounting (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.051% fail on Bracket (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.034% fail on Body
      • 0.017% fail on Panel
      • 0.017% fail on Other body component
    • 0.034% fail on Seats
      • 0.034% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.017% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.017% fail on Floor
    • 0.017% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.017% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 4.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.6% fail on Spark ignition (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.86% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.017% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.017% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.22% fail on Compression ignition (85% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on On or after 01/01/2014 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (93% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.017% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 0.60% fail on Fluid leaks (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Other leaks (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.017% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 1.9% fail on Steering
    • 0.91% fail on Steering linkage components (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Track rod end (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Locking devices (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.017% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.017% fail on Rear wheel steering
        • 0.017% fail on Components
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Steering box
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.051% fail on Operation
      • 0.034% fail on Rams (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.017% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.051% fail on Steering play
      • 0.051% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.39% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.034% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.34% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.34% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.051% fail on Attachment (83% better than other 2009 cars)

Search Good Garages