MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Matiz » 2009

Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.3% pass rate
from 4,871 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Brakes (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Plate brake tester (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.062% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (30% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (28% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.55% fail on Rbt
          • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.041% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.041% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.041% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (31% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.5% fail on Brake pads (25% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.76% fail on Brake discs and drums (34% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.76% fail on Brake discs (34% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.021% fail on Rod
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Hand lever (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Lever
      • 0.021% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.31% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.21% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.10% fail on Servos (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.041% fail on Master cylinder (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.062% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Servos (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Leaks
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (12% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamps (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Headlamp (53% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.021% fail on Dipswitch
    • 4.6% fail on Stop lamp (34% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.43% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.7% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (32% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.92% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (51% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.062% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.74% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.41% fail on Battery(ies) (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Horn
      • 0.021% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.23% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.23% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.062% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.041% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.021% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.021% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.021% fail on Switch
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Suspension arms (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Ball joint (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.35% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.60% fail on Other suspension component (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Ball joint (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.41% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.29% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.041% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.041% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.10% fail on Springs (98% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Coil springs (99% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Coil spring (99% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.062% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.041% fail on Sub-frames (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.021% fail on Axles
      • 0.021% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Washers
    • 0.55% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.23% fail on Windscreen (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.062% fail on View to rear
      • 0.062% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.47% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.041% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.041% fail on Joints
    • 0.49% fail on Fuel system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.10% fail on Tank
      • 0.10% fail on System (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.041% fail on Hose
    • 0.33% fail on Doors
      • 0.16% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
        • 0.021% fail on Catch
      • 0.10% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.10% fail on Door condition
      • 0.082% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.082% fail on Door condition
    • 0.10% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.062% fail on Engine mounting condition
      • 0.041% fail on Bracket
    • 0.082% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.062% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.062% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.041% fail on Body
      • 0.041% fail on Other body component
    • 0.041% fail on Seats
      • 0.041% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.021% fail on Chassis
      • 0.021% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.021% fail on Load security
      • 0.021% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.021% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.021% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 4.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.021% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.25% fail on Compression ignition (83% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.041% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.021% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.021% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.062% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 3.0% fail on Steering (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.021% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.72% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Pipes and hoses (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Rams (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pump
    • 0.64% fail on Steering gear (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Steering rack (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Operation
    • 0.062% fail on Steering play
      • 0.062% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.021% fail on Steering column
  • 0.66% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.23% fail on Condition
      • 0.21% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.062% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Requirements
    • 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Condition
    • 0.062% fail on Attachment (83% better than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.021% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.021% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages