Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2008
53.7% pass rate
from 4,594 tests in 2020
(14% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Brakes (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 5.0% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.15% fail on Plate brake tester (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.087% fail on Service brake performance (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.065% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 3.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.59% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on Plate brake tester (sp) (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.022% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.022% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.85% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.81% fail on Rbt
          • 0.70% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.022% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.022% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.30% fail on Brake performance not tested (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (28% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (25% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake pads (26% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.74% fail on Brake discs and drums (38% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Brake discs (41% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Brake drums
      • 0.065% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Cable
        • 0.022% fail on Lever
        • 0.022% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 1.7% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Hand lever (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.67% fail on Lever (86% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.044% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.044% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Servos
    • 0.28% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.065% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.065% fail on Servos (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.022% fail on Other components
      • 0.022% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.022% fail on Other braking system component
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps (39% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.33% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.065% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (47% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Rear fog lamp (66% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rear fog lamp (57% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Direction indicators (63% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Flashing type (63% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Individual direction indicators (53% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.065% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.50% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.22% fail on Horn
      • 0.022% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.065% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.044% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.022% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Suspension (10% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.2% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover (59% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Pins and bushes (85% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 5.0% fail on Wheel bearings (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.81% fail on Other suspension component (170% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.67% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Anti-roll bars (93% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.087% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.065% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.13% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.022% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.065% fail on Axles
      • 0.065% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.022% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.022% fail on Springs
      • 0.022% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.022% fail on Coil spring
  • 9.6% fail on Visibility (61% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.59% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.13% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 6.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (19% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (88% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission (38% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts (38% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Joints (37% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.065% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.065% fail on Joints
    • 0.57% fail on Doors (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Driver's door (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.17% fail on Door condition
        • 0.022% fail on Catch
      • 0.087% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.087% fail on Door condition
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system (100% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.022% fail on Hose
      • 0.022% fail on Pipe
      • 0.022% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.065% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.065% fail on Seats
      • 0.044% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.022% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.044% fail on Body
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component
    • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.022% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.022% fail on Chassis
      • 0.022% fail on Chassis condition
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.6% fail on Spark ignition (51% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (58% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.78% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.022% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.022% fail on NOx sensor
      • 0.065% fail on Compression ignition (96% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.022% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.022% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.48% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.33% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.022% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.0% fail on Steering
    • 1.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.087% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.022% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.20% fail on Power steering
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
      • 0.065% fail on Operation
    • 0.022% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.022% fail on Steering play
      • 0.022% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.83% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.044% fail on Requirements
      • 0.022% fail on Attachment
    • 0.087% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (87% better than other 2008 cars)
  • 0.46% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.46% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.30% fail on Condition
    • 0.022% fail on Attachment
  • 0.022% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.022% fail on Anchorages

Search Good Garages