Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2005
48.4% pass rate
from 2,665 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Prescribed areas (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Component mounting (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Spring mounting (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.34% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Front
    • 3.9% fail on Drive shafts
      • 3.9% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 3.8% fail on Constant velocity joints
        • 0.038% fail on Couplings
      • 0.038% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.038% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.0% fail on Front suspension joints (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.53% fail on Trailing arms (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.41% fail on Anti-roll bars (92% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (71% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment
      • 0.038% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Coil springs (97% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (98% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Location
    • 0.11% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.075% fail on Condition (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.075% fail on Panhard rods (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Condition (50 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment
    • 0.038% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.038% fail on Condition
    • 0.038% fail on Axles
      • 0.038% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.038% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.3% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.075% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.0% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.64% fail on Individual lamps (67% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (84% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.75% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.71% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.038% fail on Switch
    • 0.64% fail on Battery
    • 0.38% fail on Horn
    • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 17% fail on Brakes (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (60% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 3.5% fail on Components
        • 3.1% fail on Pipes
        • 0.49% fail on Hoses
        • 0.11% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.038% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
    • 2.7% fail on Hub components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.56% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake linings (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on ABS (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Service brake control components (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pedal (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.98% fail on Anti-slip (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Condition
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.86% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Restricted movement (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.038% fail on Leaks
  • 11% fail on Tyres (25% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Tread depth (42% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (38% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers (72% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.34% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.2% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Emissions
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on System (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Pipe
      • 0.075% fail on Cap
    • 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.075% fail on Requirements
    • 0.45% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 3.7% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Body condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Seats
      • 0.19% fail on Passengers
      • 0.038% fail on Drivers
    • 0.15% fail on Load security (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Access panel (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Doors (74% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Drivers
      • 0.038% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.038% fail on Passengers other
  • 2.8% fail on Steering (31% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Steering system (38% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Track rod end (39% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering
      • 0.26% fail on Other components
      • 0.038% fail on Operation
      • 0.038% fail on Drive system
      • 0.038% fail on Rams
    • 0.19% fail on Locking devices (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Steering operation
  • 0.56% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.49% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages