MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Matiz » 2005

Chevrolet Matiz MOT Results

Registered in 2005
44.8% pass rate
from 1,225 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Matiz is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 12% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 5.6% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.5% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Anti-roll bars (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.082% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.49% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.082% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.082% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.41% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.082% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.33% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.16% fail on Springs (97% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (48% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Headlamp (53% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.082% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.73% fail on Battery(ies) (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Horn
      • 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.33% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (68% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp (68% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.082% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Brakes (26% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Brake performance (47% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.2% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.082% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.082% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (62% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.98% fail on Rbt
          • 0.90% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.082% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.73% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.73% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Pedal (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Hand lever
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.57% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.57% fail on Lever
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.24% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.082% fail on Leaks
    • 0.082% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.082% fail on Air and vacuum systems
    • 0.082% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.082% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Transmission
      • 3.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.1% fail on Joints
      • 0.082% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.082% fail on Joints
    • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.49% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pipe
      • 0.082% fail on System
    • 0.49% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.33% fail on Door condition
      • 0.16% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.16% fail on Door condition
    • 0.41% fail on Body
      • 0.33% fail on Panel
      • 0.082% fail on Body condition
    • 0.24% fail on Cabs (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Floor (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.082% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.082% fail on Seats
      • 0.082% fail on Driver's seat
  • 12% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions (80% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 11% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.7% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.082% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.49% fail on Compression ignition (65% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.082% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.082% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.41% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.41% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 11% fail on Visibility (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.16% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.16% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.082% fail on View to rear
      • 0.082% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Condition
    • 0.33% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (78% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 3.3% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.41% fail on Power steering
      • 0.24% fail on Operation
      • 0.16% fail on Other components
      • 0.082% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.33% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.082% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.65% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.65% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Attachment
    • 0.082% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages