Chevrolet Lacetti MOT Results

Registered in 2009
51.2% pass rate
from 1,339 tests in 2020
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Lacetti is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 6.5% fail on Position lamps (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Position lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on All position lamps
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp aim (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.82% fail on Battery(ies) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Horn
    • 0.75% fail on Direction indicators (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Flashing type (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.45% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.22% fail on Individual direction indicators (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.37% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.075% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.075% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 21% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Rbt (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 4.6% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.075% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 4.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.075% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.075% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.075% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 6.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.075% fail on Valves
    • 0.22% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 11% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Linkage ball joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage
      • 0.075% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.6% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Ball joint (59% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.67% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.30% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.075% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.7% fail on Visibility (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.45% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.075% fail on Driver's view
  • 6.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Spark ignition (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.075% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.30% fail on Compression ignition (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Fluid leaks (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Transmission oil leaks (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Other leaks
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.45% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Airbags (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Transmission (63% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts (61% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Joints (61% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.37% fail on System (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pipe
      • 0.075% fail on Tank
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.075% fail on Load security
      • 0.075% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.075% fail on Tailgate condition
  • 3.1% fail on Steering (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.2% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.075% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.075% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.60% fail on Steering gear (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Power steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Other components (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Pump
      • 0.075% fail on Rams
  • 0.90% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.90% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
  • 0.075% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.075% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages