Chevrolet Lacetti MOT Results
Registered in 200949.3% pass rate
from 977 tests in 2021
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Lacetti is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Brakes
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
3.9% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
6.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.20% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Lever (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pedal
-
0.51% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.20% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.20% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.20% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.10% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.10% fail on Leaks
-
14% fail on
Brake performance
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
21% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(68% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.4% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(95% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp aim (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 4.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.72% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Horn
-
0.41% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.41% fail on Position lamp
-
0.41% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Individual direction indicators (83% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.10% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.41% fail on
Flashing type
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.20% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.20% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.10% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.41% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.31% fail on Linkage
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.10% fail on Pins and bushes
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.0% fail on Ball joint (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Macpherson strut
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint
- 0.72% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.41% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.41% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.31% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.31% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.20% fail on
Springs
(96% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Coil spring
- 0.10% fail on Mounting
-
0.20% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.10% fail on Ball joint
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Visibility
(56% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.0% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.41% fail on Bonnet
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.10% fail on Windscreen
-
6.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(49% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.61% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.41% fail on
Compression ignition
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Spark ignition
(68% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fluid leaks
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
4.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.31% fail on Size/type
-
5.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Transmission
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Joints (72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.10% fail on Joints
-
0.51% fail on
Drive shafts
(72% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.31% fail on Tank (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seats
- 0.31% fail on Driver's seat (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Body
- 0.10% fail on Panel
- 0.10% fail on Other body component
-
0.20% fail on
Doors
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
-
0.20% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.10% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.10% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
0.92% fail on
Steering gear
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Power steering
(8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Other components (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Rams
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.31% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.72% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.72% fail on Registration plates
-
0.41% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.31% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Condition