MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Lacetti » 2008

Chevrolet Lacetti MOT Results

Registered in 2008
48.3% pass rate
from 1,027 tests in 2021
(25% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Lacetti is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Brakes (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 8.1% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Decelerometer (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake performance (11 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (150% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 3.1% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.097% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.097% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 3.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
          • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (80% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake pads (81% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (93% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.8% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (160% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Brake fluid (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.097% fail on Valves
    • 0.19% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.097% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.097% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (91% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.68% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.68% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.58% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Direction indicators (77% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Flashing type (77% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.19% fail on Individual direction indicators (86% better than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.29% fail on Position lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.68% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.6% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (82% worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.97% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.19% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.58% fail on Springs (90% better than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Coil spring (90% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Mounting
    • 0.49% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.39% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.29% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.097% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 9.2% fail on Visibility (46% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Wipers (65% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (40% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Transmission
      • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Joints
      • 0.097% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.097% fail on Joints
    • 0.49% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.29% fail on Pipe (5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Tank
    • 0.19% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
    • 0.097% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.097% fail on Doors
      • 0.097% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.097% fail on Door condition
    • 0.097% fail on Cabs
      • 0.097% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 7.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.4% fail on Spark ignition (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested (180% worse than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.58% fail on Compression ignition (64% better than other 2008 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.097% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.097% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.097% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type
  • 5.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition
  • 3.8% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 2.3% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.097% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.097% fail on Other components
        • 0.097% fail on Steering linkage
    • 0.68% fail on Power steering (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Other components (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Rams (20 times worse than other 2008 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.58% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.39% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.19% fail on Condition
    • 0.19% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages