Chevrolet Epica MOT Results
Registered in 200946.7% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Epica is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Brakes
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
6.7% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Parking brake performance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.83% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Brake discs (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.5% fail on Brake pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.83% fail on Cable
-
6.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Electronic stability control (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake control
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Lever (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.7% fail on Hand lever (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brake performance
(170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 10% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.83% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.83% fail on
Flashing type
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
10% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Steering gear
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Steering rack (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 4.2% fail on Track rod end
-
5.8% fail on
Steering gear
(17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Tyres
- 5.8% fail on Tread depth
- 3.3% fail on Condition
-
7.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Transmission
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.83% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.7% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint
- 0.83% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.83% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.83% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.83% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
1.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
4.2% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.83% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.83% fail on Other leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.7% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Epica (2008 - 2010)
Extremely well kitted out for comfort and safety. Huge boot. Keen value. 6-speed diesel auto. 2.0 straight six petrol is chain cam.