MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Cruze » 2011

Chevrolet Cruze MOT Results

Registered in 2011
60.9% pass rate
from 1,300 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Cruze is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint (70% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.92% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 0.31% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.077% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.077% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (51% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.31% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.31% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.077% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.077% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.15% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 7.8% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.0% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.31% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt
          • 0.69% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.15% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.077% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.077% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.38% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.077% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.077% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.077% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility (50% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.077% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.077% fail on Windscreen
  • 5.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.46% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.077% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.92% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.38% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.077% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.077% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
  • 2.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.62% fail on Transmission
      • 0.62% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.62% fail on Joints
    • 0.38% fail on Bumpers (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Body
      • 0.077% fail on Panel
      • 0.077% fail on Other body component
    • 0.077% fail on Doors
      • 0.077% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
  • 0.77% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.77% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.69% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.38% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
  • 0.54% fail on Steering (71% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Power steering (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Rams (80 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.077% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.077% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.077% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.077% fail on Ball joint
  • 0.38% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.31% fail on Attachment
    • 0.077% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages