Chevrolet Cruze MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.1% pass rate
from 1,112 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Cruze is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Location
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.45% fail on Anti-roll bars (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage condition
    • 0.36% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.090% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.090% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.090% fail on Front
  • 13% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.27% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.27% fail on Battery
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type (82% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.090% fail on Individual lamps
    • 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.090% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.090% fail on Horn
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Hub components (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.090% fail on Brake back plates
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.45% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.36% fail on Front wheels
    • 1.3% fail on ABS (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.45% fail on Components
        • 0.36% fail on Hoses
        • 0.090% fail on Pipes
      • 0.090% fail on Operation
    • 0.45% fail on Electronic stability system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.090% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 6.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.81% fail on Windscreen (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Emissions (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Emissions not tested (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.090% fail on Cap
  • 1.4% fail on Registration plates and VIN (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.99% fail on Steering
    • 0.45% fail on Power steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Other components (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Steering operation (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Steering system (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.090% fail on Steering control
      • 0.090% fail on Steering column
  • 0.90% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.90% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.090% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 0.45% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.27% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 0.27% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.090% fail on Body condition
    • 0.090% fail on Doors
      • 0.090% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.090% fail on Load security
      • 0.090% fail on Bootlid
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Cruze (2009 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Also comes with a six-speed automatic. Decent VCDi diesels. Driver and passenger seats both height adjustable.

    Search Good Garages