Chevrolet Cruze MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.1% pass rate
from 1,160 tests in 2020
(24% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Cruze is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Springs (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Coil spring (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Suspension arms (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Pins and bushes (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.52% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.086% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.95% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage
      • 0.086% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.78% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.17% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.17% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.086% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.34% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.17% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.086% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.086% fail on Horn
    • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.086% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 12% fail on Brakes (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.086% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.086% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.086% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Electronic stability control (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.43% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.086% fail on Pedal
    • 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.086% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.086% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.086% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.086% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 5.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.52% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.6% fail on Visibility (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.086% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.17% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.086% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.086% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual
        • 0.086% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.086% fail on Other leaks
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Transmission (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Drive shafts (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.086% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.086% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.086% fail on Pipe
    • 0.086% fail on Seats
      • 0.086% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.086% fail on Undertray
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.86% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.086% fail on Requirements
      • 0.086% fail on Condition
    • 0.086% fail on Airbags
      • 0.086% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Steering (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.17% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.17% fail on Power steering
      • 0.17% fail on Other components (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Steering play
      • 0.086% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Cruze (2009 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Also comes with a six-speed automatic. Decent VCDi diesels. Driver and passenger seats both height adjustable.

    Search Good Garages