Chevrolet Cruze MOT Results
Registered in 200956.5% pass rate
from 395 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Cruze is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.6% fail on Coil spring
-
6.6% fail on
Coil springs
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint
- 3.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.25% fail on Linkage
- 0.51% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.51% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.51% fail on Ball joint
- 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings
-
6.6% fail on
Springs
-
14% fail on
Brakes
(62% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Brake pads (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
-
0.51% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.25% fail on Cable
- 0.25% fail on Lever
-
5.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(160% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
- 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.51% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.51% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
3.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Electronic stability control (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.25% fail on Lever
-
0.25% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.25% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.25% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Other components
-
6.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.51% fail on Position lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
(54% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Washers
- 4.8% fail on Wipers
-
0.25% fail on
View to rear
- 0.25% fail on Mirrors
-
7.3% fail on
Tyres
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth
- 3.5% fail on Condition
- 0.51% fail on Size/type
-
7.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.76% fail on Emissions not tested
-
3.5% fail on
Compression ignition
(140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
4.1% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.25% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.25% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(71% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.0% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.3% fail on
Transmission
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 2.3% fail on Joints
-
2.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.51% fail on
Body
- 0.51% fail on Panel (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.25% fail on Boot lid condition
-
1.0% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.0% fail on Registration plates
-
0.76% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.51% fail on Condition
- 0.25% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.51% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.51% fail on
Steering
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.51% fail on Track rod end
-
0.51% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.25% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Cruze (2009 - 2015)
Good value for money. Also comes with a six-speed automatic. Decent VCDi diesels. Driver and passenger seats both height adjustable.