Chevrolet Cruze MOT Results
Registered in 200960.0% pass rate
from 432 tests in 2020
(8.1% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Cruze is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Suspension
(5.6% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Pins and bushes (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Ball joint (14% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.1% fail on
Springs
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Coil spring (16% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Coil springs
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (18% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Ball joint dust cover (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.46% fail on Shock absorbers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Wheel bearings
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(9.4% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(50% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (46% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Stop lamp (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamps
(13% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (13% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Direction indicators
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Flashing type
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.23% fail on Position lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.23% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.23% fail on Reversing lamps
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(50% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
(47% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake performance (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake imbalance (2.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.0% fail on
Rbt
(33% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(15% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake performance
(47% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
(52% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.23% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.23% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.2% fail on
Service brake performance
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(42% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(23% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Brake discs (22% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(70% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(180% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pedal (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Hand lever (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake control
(26% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Lever (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
-
5.6% fail on
Brake performance
(30% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Visibility
(24% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Wipers (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Washers (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Driver's view (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
(2.8% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth (17% better than other 2009 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(22% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Exhaust system (73% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Transmission
(35% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Joints (31% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Drive shafts
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Fuel system
(150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Pipe (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Undertray (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Body
- 0.23% fail on Other body component
-
0.23% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.23% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(35% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Catalyst emissions (21% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.69% fail on
Compression ignition
(50% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2.9% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
3.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.93% fail on
Fluid leaks
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Engine oil leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(19% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(27% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.23% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.93% fail on
Road Wheels
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Attachment (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Steering
(66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.23% fail on Steering rack
-
0.23% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.23% fail on Track rod end
-
0.23% fail on
Power steering
- 0.23% fail on Other components
-
0.23% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.46% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Registration plates (2.8% worse than other 2009 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Cruze (2009 - 2015)
Good value for money. Also comes with a six-speed automatic. Decent VCDi diesels. Driver and passenger seats both height adjustable.