Chevrolet Captiva MOT Results
Registered in 201270.4% pass rate
from 1,215 tests in 2017
(42% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Captiva is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(140% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamps
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.082% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
-
0.082% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.082% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.16% fail on Individual lamps
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (77% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Position lamps
(67% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Front lamps (72% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rear lamps
-
0.41% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.41% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.16% fail on Battery
- 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.082% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
7.7% fail on
Headlamps
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Tyres
(34% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.082% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.4% fail on Wipers
- 1.2% fail on Washers
- 0.082% fail on Windscreen
- 0.082% fail on Mirrors
-
4.4% fail on
Brakes
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 2.7% fail on Brake pads
- 0.25% fail on Brake discs
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
- 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.41% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.16% fail on Gradient hand brake (114 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Front wheels
- 0.082% fail on Brake operation
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.16% fail on
Components
- 0.082% fail on Pipes
- 0.082% fail on Hoses
-
0.16% fail on
Components
- 0.082% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.082% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.082% fail on Electronic parking brake
- 0.082% fail on ABS
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
-
3.3% fail on
Suspension
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.16% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.58% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.33% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.33% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.33% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.33% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.25% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.082% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Coil springs
(90% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.16% fail on Front
- 0.082% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Shock absorbers
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.66% fail on Registration plate
-
0.58% fail on
Steering
-
0.25% fail on
Steering system
- 0.16% fail on Steering rack
- 0.082% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Power steering
- 0.082% fail on Operation
- 0.082% fail on Other components
-
0.25% fail on
Steering system
-
0.58% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.33% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.082% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.25% fail on Condition
-
0.33% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.33% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.33% fail on Attachment
-
0.25% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.082% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.082% fail on Chassis
-
0.082% fail on
Doors
- 0.082% fail on Passengers other
-
0.082% fail on
Load security
- 0.082% fail on Bootlid
-
0.082% fail on
Vehicle structure
-
0.25% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.16% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Pipe
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Captiva (2007 - 2015)
Well equipped as standard. Seats seven reasonably comfortably. Quiet when cruising. Decent diesel engine. Improved facelifted model from 2011.