Chevrolet Captiva MOT Results

Registered in 2012
70.4% pass rate
from 1,215 tests in 2017
(42% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Captiva is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.082% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.082% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.082% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Side repeaters (8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.16% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.1% fail on Stop lamp (77% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Position lamps (67% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Front lamps (72% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.41% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.41% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Battery
    • 0.082% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.082% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 7.5% fail on Tyres (34% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.082% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 0.082% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.082% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.4% fail on Brakes
    • 2.8% fail on Hub components
      • 2.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.25% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.58% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.41% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Gradient hand brake (114 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.082% fail on Brake operation
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Components
        • 0.082% fail on Pipes
        • 0.082% fail on Hoses
    • 0.082% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.082% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.082% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.082% fail on ABS
  • 3.3% fail on Suspension
    • 1.1% fail on Shock absorbers (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.58% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.16% fail on Attachment (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.58% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.33% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.33% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.25% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.082% fail on Attachment
    • 0.16% fail on Coil springs (90% better than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (90% better than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.16% fail on Front
    • 0.082% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 0.66% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.66% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.58% fail on Steering
    • 0.25% fail on Steering system
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.082% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.16% fail on Steering operation (14 times worse than other 2012 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.082% fail on Operation
      • 0.082% fail on Other components
  • 0.58% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.33% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.25% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.082% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
  • 0.33% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 0.25% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.082% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.082% fail on Chassis
    • 0.082% fail on Doors
      • 0.082% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.082% fail on Load security
      • 0.082% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.25% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.25% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.16% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
      • 0.082% fail on Pipe
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Captiva (2007 - 2015)
    Good value for money. Well equipped as standard. Seats seven reasonably comfortably. Quiet when cruising. Decent diesel engine. Improved facelifted model from 2011.

    Search Good Garages