Chevrolet Captiva MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.1% pass rate
from 2,163 tests in 2017
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Captiva is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Headlamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.046% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.046% fail on Switch
    • 6.1% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Front lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Direction indicators (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Flashing type (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Side repeaters (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Individual lamps (72% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.60% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Trailer electrical socket (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.046% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.046% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.046% fail on Switch
  • 19% fail on Suspension (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Suspension arms (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Attachment (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Coil springs (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Condition (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.046% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.83% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.8% fail on Shock absorbers (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Front suspension joints (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.60% fail on Front (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.046% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.046% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.046% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 12% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Brake pads (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.97% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.51% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Parking brake operation (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Gradient hand brake (29 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on ABS (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Hydraulic systems (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Hoses
      • 0.046% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.51% fail on Electronic stability system (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.092% fail on Pedal
        • 0.092% fail on Condition
    • 0.046% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.092% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.18% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
  • 2.1% fail on Steering (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering system (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Other components (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.046% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.046% fail on Locking devices
  • 2.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust system (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.32% fail on System (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.0% fail on Registration plates and VIN (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.14% fail on Load security (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Tailgate (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.046% fail on Body security
    • 0.046% fail on Doors
      • 0.046% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.046% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.046% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Captiva (2007 - 2015)
    Well equipped as standard. Seats seven reasonably comfortably. Quiet when cruising. Decent diesel engine. Improved facelifted model from 2011.

    Search Good Garages