Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results
Registered in 201258.8% pass rate
from 1,679 tests in 2021
(40% worse than other 2012 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
13% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
13% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 13% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
13% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.060% fail on Suspension arm
-
5.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Linkage
- 0.060% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.77% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.66% fail on
Macpherson strut
(6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.60% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
- 0.060% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
13% fail on
Springs
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(41% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.060% fail on Dipswitch
- 0.060% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.060% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.18% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.12% fail on Position lamp
- 0.060% fail on All position lamps
-
0.18% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.18% fail on Horn
-
0.12% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.060% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.060% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.060% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.060% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
(41% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Visibility
(44% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (44% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
0.18% fail on
View to rear
- 0.18% fail on Mirrors
-
5.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.060% fail on Oxygen sensor
-
2.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(190% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (140% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.71% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo (11 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.060% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.060% fail on Particulate filter
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(160% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.060% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
5.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(170% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
-
4.7% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(87% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system (190% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
- 0.060% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.060% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.060% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.060% fail on Joints
-
1.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
-
0.18% fail on
Engine mounting
(7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Engine mounting condition (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Bracket
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
-
0.12% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.12% fail on Door condition
-
0.060% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.060% fail on Door condition
-
0.12% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.060% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
0.060% fail on
Sub-frame
- 0.060% fail on Strengthening plate
-
0.060% fail on
Sub-frame
-
0.060% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.060% fail on Pipe
-
0.060% fail on
Cabs
- 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.060% fail on Undertray
-
4.1% fail on
Brakes
(31% better than other 2012 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.12% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.12% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(65% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Rbt (sp) (63% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.060% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.18% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.060% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(58% better than other 2012 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(48% better than other 2012 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Brake pads (48% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.12% fail on Cable
-
0.060% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.060% fail on Brake discs
-
1.1% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(48% better than other 2012 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.54% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Pedal
-
0.060% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.060% fail on Brake fluid
-
2.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Steering
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.060% fail on Ball joint
-
0.060% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.060% fail on Steering rack
-
0.060% fail on
Power steering
- 0.060% fail on Other components
- 0.060% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.060% fail on
Steering play
- 0.060% fail on Steering box
-
1.9% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.95% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(180% worse than other 2012 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Registration plates (180% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(82% better than other 2012 cars)
- 0.12% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review
-
Chevrolet Aveo (2011 - 2015)
Nice looking hatchback. Good value for money. Decent handling. Good legroom in the back. Reasonable bootspace. Diesel has stop/start.