Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2011
64.2% pass rate
from 1,444 tests in 2017
(45% worse than other 2011 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2011 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (36% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (67% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (60% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Battery (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Direction indicators (80% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2011 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.069% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 11% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Suspension arms (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.069% fail on Linkage condition
    • 1.8% fail on Macpherson strut (21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (21 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Rear (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Front
    • 0.97% fail on Front suspension joints (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.97% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (77% better than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.28% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.28% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.069% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.069% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.4% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear wheels (5 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front wheels (160% worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.069% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.069% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.9% fail on Hub components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.069% fail on Brake drums
    • 1.0% fail on ABS (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.76% fail on Restricted movement (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.55% fail on Components
        • 0.42% fail on Pipes
        • 0.14% fail on Hoses
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.14% fail on Condition
  • 7.9% fail on Driver's view of the road (76% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers (83% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (77% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.21% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 4.4% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Valve stem (3 times worse than other 2011 cars)
  • 4.2% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.069% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.069% fail on Other components
  • 3.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (6 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (14 times worse than other 2011 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag (9 times worse than other 2011 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.21% fail on Condition
  • 0.90% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.42% fail on Emissions
    • 0.21% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.21% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.14% fail on System
      • 0.069% fail on Cap
    • 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.069% fail on Condition
    • 0.069% fail on Attachment
  • 0.14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.069% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.069% fail on Body condition
  • 0.14% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.14% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

  • Chevrolet Aveo (2011 - 2015)
    Nice looking hatchback. Good value for money. Decent handling. Good legroom in the back. Reasonable bootspace. Diesel has stop/start.

    Search Good Garages