Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
56.1% pass rate
from 1,929 tests in 2017
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Position lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
    • 6.9% fail on Stop lamp (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.31% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.052% fail on Switch
    • 0.31% fail on Battery
    • 0.21% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.10% fail on Direction indicators (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Flashing type (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 16% fail on Suspension (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Suspension arms (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Attachment (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.9% fail on Macpherson strut (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Front suspension joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.93% fail on Condition
      • 0.052% fail on Fitment
    • 0.93% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Rear (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Front
    • 0.47% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.47% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.47% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.21% fail on Coil springs (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (95% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Location
    • 0.16% fail on Bonded suspension (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 0.10% fail on Radius arms (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.052% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Wipers (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Washers (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.2% fail on Steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering system (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Track rod end (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.10% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.052% fail on Free play
        • 0.052% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.10% fail on Power steering
      • 0.052% fail on Pump
      • 0.052% fail on Other components
  • 8.5% fail on Brakes (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Brake performance (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Front wheels (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.67% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.16% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.052% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.2% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.052% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.10% fail on Leaks
    • 2.1% fail on ABS (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.31% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.31% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.31% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.052% fail on Pedal
        • 0.052% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Restricted movement
  • 8.3% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
    • 0.10% fail on Valve stem
  • 1.9% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.93% fail on Emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Fuel system (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on System (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Cap
    • 0.52% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.26% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Installation check
        • 0.052% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.67% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.36% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.16% fail on Body condition
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.10% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.052% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.052% fail on Seats
      • 0.052% fail on Passengers
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
    • 0.052% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages