Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.3% pass rate
from 2,157 tests in 2020
(47% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Stop lamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.3% fail on Position lamps (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Position lamp (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on All position lamps
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.65% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.65% fail on Reversing lamps (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Reversing lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.56% fail on Direction indicators (70% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Flashing type (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.56% fail on Battery(ies) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 19% fail on Suspension (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.093% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 5.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage
      • 0.14% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.046% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Macpherson strut (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Pins and bushes (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Macpherson strut (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Springs (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Coil springs (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Coil spring (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.70% fail on Other suspension component (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.046% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 14% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 13% fail on Track rod end (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Power steering
      • 0.093% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Operation
    • 0.093% fail on Steering play
      • 0.093% fail on Steering rack
  • 13% fail on Brakes (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Brake performance (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Rbt (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.1% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.88% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.70% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.37% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.32% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.046% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.83% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.83% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.14% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.093% fail on Cable
        • 0.046% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.42% fail on Lever
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.28% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.046% fail on Pedal
    • 0.23% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.23% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.14% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 9.4% fail on Visibility (89% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wipers (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on View to rear (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Mirrors (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.093% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.093% fail on Windscreen
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Size/type
  • 4.5% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Spark ignition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.093% fail on Compression ignition (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.046% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.32% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.046% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 3.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.70% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on System (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Pipe (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.046% fail on Tank
    • 0.60% fail on Transmission (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.60% fail on Joints
    • 0.28% fail on Doors
      • 0.14% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.14% fail on Door condition
      • 0.093% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.093% fail on Door condition
      • 0.046% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.046% fail on Door condition
    • 0.046% fail on Body
      • 0.046% fail on Other body component
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
      • 0.046% fail on Requirements
    • 0.046% fail on Airbags
      • 0.046% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.14% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.046% fail on Condition
  • 0.046% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.046% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages