MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Aveo » 2010

Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
49.9% pass rate
from 1,872 tests in 2021
(39% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.0% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.053% fail on Suspension arm
    • 5.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Linkage
      • 0.053% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 1.6% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.91% fail on Springs (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Coil spring (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.053% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.053% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.16% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.11% fail on Axles
      • 0.11% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.053% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.053% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.053% fail on Sub-frame
  • 15% fail on Brakes (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.11% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.053% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake imbalance (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.91% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.91% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.43% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.053% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.053% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.27% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.3% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.64% fail on Hydraulic systems (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Brake fluid (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.53% fail on Lever
    • 0.27% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.11% fail on Pedal
    • 0.053% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Headlamp (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.43% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.37% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Horn
    • 0.32% fail on Direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Flashing type (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.053% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.32% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.21% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.21% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.11% fail on Main beam tell-tale (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 12% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.6% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Power steering
      • 0.053% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.053% fail on Rams
      • 0.053% fail on Other components
    • 0.053% fail on Steering play
      • 0.053% fail on Steering rack
  • 10% fail on Visibility (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Washers (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on View to rear
      • 0.32% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.21% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.21% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust system (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.2% fail on Joints
        • 0.053% fail on Drive shaft
    • 0.96% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Pipe (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Hose (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Tank
      • 0.053% fail on System
    • 0.16% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.053% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.053% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.053% fail on Panel
      • 0.053% fail on Other body component
    • 0.053% fail on Chassis
      • 0.053% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.053% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.053% fail on Bracket
    • 0.053% fail on Seats
      • 0.053% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.053% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.053% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Spark ignition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.11% fail on Non catalyst emissions (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Compression ignition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.053% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.053% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.37% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.21% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Transmission oil leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Other leaks
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.11% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Airbags (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Drivers airbag (14 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.64% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.64% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.43% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
  • 0.053% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.053% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages