MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Chevrolet » Aveo » 2009

Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
45.3% pass rate
from 4,386 tests in 2021
(44% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.9% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 8.3% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.11% fail on Plate brake tester (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.068% fail on Service brake performance (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.023% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.023% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.96% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.89% fail on Rbt
          • 0.82% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.046% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.023% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.068% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.046% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.023% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.25% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 2.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (24% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.023% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.78% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.78% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.023% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.023% fail on Lever
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Lever (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.59% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Hand lever (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pedal
    • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.091% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.068% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.046% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 20% fail on Suspension (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Suspension arms (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.091% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.046% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 1.9% fail on Macpherson strut (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Coil spring (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.091% fail on Mounting
    • 0.96% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.52% fail on Shock absorbers (41% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.068% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.068% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.046% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp (69% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamp aim (32% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim (26% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.64% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.55% fail on Battery(ies) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Horn
    • 0.52% fail on Direction indicators (73% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Flashing type (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Side repeaters (59% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.32% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (52% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.16% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.023% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.023% fail on Switch
    • 0.023% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.023% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.091% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.023% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
    • 2.1% fail on Steering gear (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Pipes and hoses (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Other components
      • 0.023% fail on Operation
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 11% fail on Visibility (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Washers (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on View to rear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Indirect vision devices (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.14% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.091% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.068% fail on Driver's view (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust emissions (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Spark ignition (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.7% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.068% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.27% fail on Compression ignition (81% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.046% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (94% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.023% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.023% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.71% fail on Fluid leaks (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Engine oil leaks (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Other leaks (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
  • 7.1% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Transmission
      • 1.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.3% fail on Joints
        • 0.046% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.068% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.068% fail on Joints
    • 0.93% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Hose (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.068% fail on System (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.41% fail on Integral vehicle structure (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Bumpers (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.091% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.068% fail on Door condition
        • 0.023% fail on Hinge
      • 0.091% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.068% fail on Door condition
        • 0.023% fail on Hinge
      • 0.068% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.068% fail on Door condition
    • 0.16% fail on Chassis (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Chassis condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Body
      • 0.068% fail on Panel
      • 0.046% fail on Other body component
      • 0.023% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.091% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.023% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.046% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.046% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.023% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.023% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.023% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.023% fail on Undertray
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Requirements (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Airbags (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.36% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.36% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.30% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Attachment
    • 0.091% fail on Condition
  • 0.023% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.023% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages