Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2009

45.1% pass rate

from 4,787 tests in 2020

(49% worse than other 2009 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

22% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Suspension arms (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 8.4% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.3% fail on Ball joint (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover (62% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Suspension arm (21% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.54% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (54% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Ball joint dust cover (50% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Linkage (8.2% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (4.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes (46% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 1.7% fail on Macpherson strut (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.96% fail on Pins and bushes (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (20% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Springs (84% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.71% fail on Coil springs (84% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.71% fail on Coil spring (84% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Other suspension component (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.29% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Other suspension component
  - 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.19% fail on Sub-frames (29% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Sub-frame (35% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.021% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.021% fail on Ball joint
- 0.10% fail on Suspension rods (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Ball joint
- 0.063% fail on Axles (63% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (59% better than other 2009 cars)
22% fail on Brakes (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 11% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 11% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 9.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.042% fail on Plate brake tester (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.042% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 2.8% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 2.7% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (17% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (12% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Parking brake performance (0.54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.79% fail on Rbt (4.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.65% fail on Parking brake performance (4.3% better than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.084% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      - 0.063% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (9.8% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 4.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (13% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (25% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.7% fail on Brake pads (25% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (4.9% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Brake discs (3.8% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Brake drums
  - 0.084% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (30% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.042% fail on Lever (68% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Cable
    - 0.021% fail on Brake slack adjuster
- 0.79% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Pedal (12% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Parking brake control (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Lever (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.42% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.13% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (6.1% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.063% fail on Flexible brake hoses (46% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
  - 0.021% fail on Prescribed areas
    - 0.021% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (43% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Headlamps (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 5.6% fail on Headlamp (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.61% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (91% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Direction indicators (62% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.71% fail on Flashing type (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.52% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.56% fail on Electrical equipment (20% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Battery(ies) (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Horn (50% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.54% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (11% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.54% fail on Rear fog lamp (11% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp (16% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.042% fail on Switch (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Position lamps (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.15% fail on Position lamp (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps (4.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Reversing lamps (11% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Reversing lamp switch
- 0.042% fail on Hazard warning (10% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Switch (10% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.021% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
  - 0.021% fail on Main beam tell-tale
13% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Steering linkage components (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 11% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.29% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Drag link end (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Steering arm
  - 0.021% fail on Other components
    - 0.021% fail on Steering linkage
  - 0.021% fail on Locking devices
- 1.9% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Power steering (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Operation (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Pump (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Steering play (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.23% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Steering column
10% fail on Visibility (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Wipers (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Washers (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.69% fail on View to rear (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.69% fail on Mirrors (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Bonnet (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Driver's view (15% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Condition of glass (15% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Windscreen (5.7% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Window
7.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Exhaust emissions (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 6.6% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 3.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 2.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.98% fail on Emissions not tested (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.021% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
    - 0.021% fail on Non catalyst emissions
  - 0.27% fail on Compression ignition (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.13% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (74% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.084% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo (98% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.021% fail on Other emission control equipment
    - 0.021% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    - 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.58% fail on Fluid leaks (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Other leaks (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Transmission oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
7.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Transmission (27% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 1.2% fail on Joints (29% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Drive shaft
  - 0.084% fail on Prop shafts (0.24% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.084% fail on Joints (27% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Fuel system (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.29% fail on Pipe (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.21% fail on System (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Tank (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Hose (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Integral vehicle structure (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.25% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Bumpers (82% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Doors (6.6% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Other passenger's door (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.10% fail on Door condition (22% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.063% fail on Front passenger's door (21% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.063% fail on Door condition (19% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Driver's door (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    - 0.021% fail on Door condition
    - 0.021% fail on Hinge
- 0.10% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Body (17% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Panel (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Other body component (45% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.084% fail on Boot lid (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.084% fail on Boot lid condition (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Seats (56% better than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.042% fail on Passenger's seat (1.1% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.021% fail on Engine mounting condition
7.2% fail on Tyres (7.5% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Tread depth (19% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (13% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type (24% better than other 2009 cars)
2.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Seat belts (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.56% fail on Condition (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.10% fail on Requirements (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.021% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.13% fail on Airbags (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  - 0.13% fail on Drivers airbag (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
0.33% fail on Identification of the vehicle (26% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Registration plates (26% better than other 2009 cars)
0.31% fail on Road Wheels (29% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment (40% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Condition (4.5% better than other 2009 cars)
0.042% fail on Seat belt installation check (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Belt(s)/padding (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)