Chevrolet Aveo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
52.3% pass rate
from 5,031 tests in 2017
(46% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Chevrolet Aveo is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.060% fail on All position lamps
    • 6.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Headlamps (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Headlamp (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.020% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.58% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.32% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.020% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.020% fail on Switch
    • 0.30% fail on Direction indicators (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Flashing type (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Individual lamps (79% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.099% fail on Horn
    • 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 16% fail on Suspension (47% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
    • 5.7% fail on Suspension arms (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 2.7% fail on Macpherson strut (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Condition (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Front suspension joints (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Drive shafts (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Front drive shafts (47% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.58% fail on Constant velocity joints (46% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.32% fail on Rear
      • 0.20% fail on Front
    • 0.34% fail on Coil springs (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition (93% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Location
    • 0.20% fail on Tie bars/rods (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.099% fail on Bonded suspension (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.060% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.060% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.040% fail on Trailing arms (80% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.020% fail on Condition
      • 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.020% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.020% fail on Suspension unit
  • 15% fail on Brakes (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.1% fail on Brake performance (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Parking brake performance (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.099% fail on Brake operation (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.8% fail on ABS (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Hoses
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Operation
      • 0.020% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.70% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.040% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.040% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.020% fail on Brake calipers
    • 0.64% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.46% fail on Condition
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
        • 0.14% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.020% fail on Components
        • 0.020% fail on Pipes
  • 11% fail on Steering (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.6% fail on Track rod end (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Drag link end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Free play
        • 0.020% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.040% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.020% fail on Power steering
      • 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses
  • 10.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Mirrors (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Bonnet
  • 8.4% fail on Tyres (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Tread depth (40% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.20% fail on Size/type
    • 0.14% fail on Valve stem
  • 2.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (38% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions (90% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Fuel system (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on System (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
      • 0.080% fail on Pipe (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Exhaust system (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.6% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.93% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.64% fail on Seat belts (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Condition
      • 0.16% fail on Requirements (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Installation check
        • 0.020% fail on Anchorage's
      • 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.56% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.56% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.28% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.099% fail on Doors
      • 0.040% fail on Drivers
      • 0.040% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.020% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.060% fail on Body condition
    • 0.040% fail on Seats
      • 0.020% fail on Passengers
      • 0.020% fail on Drivers
    • 0.040% fail on Load security
      • 0.040% fail on Bootlid (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.020% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
    • 0.060% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages