BMW Z4 MOT Results
Registered in 201080.5% pass rate
from 2,032 tests in 2021
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW Z4 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Condition (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Coil spring (29% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Coil springs
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.39% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.098% fail on Ball joint (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
-
0.049% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.049% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.049% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.049% fail on Suspension unit
-
3.8% fail on
Springs
(29% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Visibility
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.0% fail on Washers (62% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.049% fail on Windscreen
-
3.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.84% fail on
Headlamps
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Headlamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.59% fail on
Direction indicators
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.049% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.59% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.098% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Road Wheels
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Condition (20 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Attachment
-
2.4% fail on
Brakes
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(60% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Brake linings
-
0.30% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Brake discs (74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Brake performance
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Service brake performance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp) (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Parking brake performance
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Parking brake performance (85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Rbt
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.34% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.34% fail on Electronic parking brake (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.098% fail on Anti-lock braking system (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.049% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.049% fail on Pedal
- 0.049% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.049% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.049% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(60% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.89% fail on
Spark ignition
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.25% fail on Catalyst emissions (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.049% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.049% fail on Catalytic converter
-
0.89% fail on
Spark ignition
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.049% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.049% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.89% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.69% fail on Registration plates
-
0.25% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.098% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.098% fail on Condition
-
0.20% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.098% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.049% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.049% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.049% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.098% fail on
Fuel system
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW Z4 (2009 - 2016)
Stylish and refined. Strong performance from six-cylinder engines. Much improved steering feel after 2013 revamp.