BMW Z4 MOT Results
Registered in 200980.3% pass rate
from 2,608 tests in 2021
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW Z4 is unusually good or bad.
-
5.3% fail on
Suspension
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Springs
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Coil spring (29% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.1% fail on
Coil springs
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint (83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(89% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.077% fail on Linkage ball joints (94% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.038% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.038% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.038% fail on Ball joint
-
4.1% fail on
Springs
(29% better than other 2009 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth (51% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Size/type
-
3.9% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Headlamps
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Headlamp (82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Direction indicators
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Individual direction indicators (61% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Flashing type
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Stop lamp (86% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Horn
- 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.23% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Rear fog lamp (65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.12% fail on Reversing lamps
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Visibility
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Washers (28% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.077% fail on
View to rear
- 0.077% fail on Mirrors
-
0.038% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.038% fail on Windscreen
-
2.8% fail on
Brakes
(68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(87% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs (87% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.88% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.69% fail on
Brake performance
(85% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Service brake performance (85% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Service brake imbalance (75% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Rbt
(82% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp) (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.038% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.038% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.038% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt
- 0.038% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.038% fail on
Rbt
-
0.42% fail on
Service brake performance
(83% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.23% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.23% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.077% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.42% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.35% fail on Electronic parking brake (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Lever
- 0.23% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.038% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.038% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.038% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.038% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.038% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
1.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(52% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.77% fail on Catalyst emissions (43% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.077% fail on
Compression ignition
(95% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(49% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
-
0.38% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.38% fail on Registration plates
-
0.38% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.038% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.038% fail on
Transmission
-
0.038% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.038% fail on Joints
-
0.038% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.038% fail on
Doors
-
0.038% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.038% fail on Hinge
-
0.038% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.038% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.038% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.038% fail on Undertray
-
0.38% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(64% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.31% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.038% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.038% fail on Condition
-
0.038% fail on
Airbags
- 0.038% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.077% fail on
Steering
(97% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.038% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.038% fail on Track rod end
- 0.038% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.038% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review