BMW Z4 MOT Results
Registered in 200564.1% pass rate
from 2,508 tests in 2021
(18% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW Z4 is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.6% fail on Pins and bushes (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (70% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.1% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Ball joint
- 0.28% fail on Linkage
- 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.040% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
(49% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Coil spring (48% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.24% fail on Wheel bearings (83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.040% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.040% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension arms
-
12% fail on
Brakes
- 5.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.040% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.040% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.2% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (58% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.64% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.64% fail on
Parking brake performance
(60% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance (59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.040% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.040% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
(61% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.28% fail on Service brake imbalance (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(87% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(55% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Brake pads (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Brake linings
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(48% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs (47% better than other 2005 cars)
-
1.00% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.36% fail on Lever
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.20% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.040% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(74% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Hand lever
- 0.040% fail on Pedal
-
0.080% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.080% fail on Servos
-
0.040% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.040% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.040% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.040% fail on Other components
-
9.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(36% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.080% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.040% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.040% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.040% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.080% fail on
Compression ignition
(94% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.040% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
8.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.32% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.28% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.040% fail on Other leaks
-
0.040% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.040% fail on Undertray
-
8.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(40% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 1.00% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.80% fail on Stop lamp (81% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Direction indicators
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Individual direction indicators (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Side repeaters (85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Flashing type
(85% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.20% fail on Position lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Rear fog lamp (84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(84% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Electrical equipment
(75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Horn
- 0.040% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.040% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.080% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.080% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
- 0.040% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
0.040% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.040% fail on Switch
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(36% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
- 2.1% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Bonnet (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
View to rear
- 0.28% fail on Mirrors
-
0.040% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.040% fail on Windscreen
-
4.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Airbags
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.040% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
(91% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Requirements
-
4.6% fail on
Tyres
(28% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
- 2.1% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.48% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.40% fail on
Doors
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Door condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.080% fail on Door condition
-
0.32% fail on
Driver's door
(170% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Exhaust system (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.080% fail on Bumpers
-
0.080% fail on
Transmission
(98% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Drive shafts
(98% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.040% fail on Joints
-
0.080% fail on
Drive shafts
(98% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Undertray
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
-
0.64% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.64% fail on Registration plates
-
0.60% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.32% fail on Attachment
- 0.28% fail on Condition
-
0.56% fail on
Steering
(86% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Track rod end (92% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Ball joint
- 0.040% fail on Drag link end
-
0.20% fail on
Power steering
- 0.16% fail on Operation
- 0.040% fail on Rams
-
0.040% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.040% fail on Steering rack
- 0.040% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.28% fail on
Steering linkage components
(90% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW Z4 (2003 - 2009)
Better looking and a sportier drive than its Z3 predecessor.