BMW Z3 MOT Results
Registered in 199759.4% pass rate
from 1,998 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW Z3 is unusually good or bad.
-
14% fail on
Suspension
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Ball joint (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes (72% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Suspension arm (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
4.4% fail on
Springs
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Mounting
-
4.4% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (32% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.15% fail on Linkage
- 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
- 0.050% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
1.0% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.50% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.25% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.050% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
- 0.75% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.25% fail on Wheel bearings (82% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.20% fail on Ball joint
- 0.050% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.10% fail on
Axles
- 0.10% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.050% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.050% fail on Macpherson strut
-
0.050% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
-
6.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(81% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(77% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(86% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Spark ignition
(97% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.30% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.050% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.20% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
(73% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.050% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
14% fail on
Spark ignition
(97% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.25% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.050% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
14% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(86% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
13% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.050% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.050% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
- 0.95% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.050% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.050% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.3% fail on
Rbt
-
1.1% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(64% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% better than other 1997 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(62% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes (98% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (60% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Electronic stability control
-
1.7% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.90% fail on Brake pads
-
0.50% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.35% fail on Brake discs
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.20% fail on Pedal
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
- 0.35% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.30% fail on Lever
-
0.10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.10% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.10% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.10% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.10% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(23% better than other 1997 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.050% fail on Dipswitch
-
1.5% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.5% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.90% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.75% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.50% fail on Horn
- 0.20% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.050% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.70% fail on
Direction indicators
(71% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Flashing type
(71% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.30% fail on Individual direction indicators (80% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.70% fail on
Flashing type
(71% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.15% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.15% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.10% fail on Position lamp
- 0.050% fail on Switch
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.9% fail on
Visibility
- 4.6% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
-
0.40% fail on
View to rear
- 0.40% fail on Mirrors
- 0.30% fail on Bonnet
-
0.10% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.050% fail on Windscreen
- 0.050% fail on Window
-
5.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(43% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.85% fail on
Seat belts
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Prescribed areas (72% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
- 0.10% fail on Condition (80% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Airbags
- 0.10% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.050% fail on Passengers airbag
-
4.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(50% better than other 1997 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (32% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Seats
(110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.70% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(63% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.70% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (63% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Chassis
(66% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Chassis condition (66% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Doors
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.25% fail on Door condition
- 0.050% fail on Catch
-
0.20% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.20% fail on Door condition
-
0.30% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.25% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.20% fail on Pipe
- 0.050% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
(92% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Joints (96% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.050% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.050% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Bumpers
-
0.050% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.050% fail on Carrier
-
0.050% fail on
Body
- 0.050% fail on Panel
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
(68% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Steering linkage components
(66% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Track rod end (51% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Ball joint
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.10% fail on Operation
- 0.10% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.10% fail on Pump
- 0.050% fail on Other components
-
0.15% fail on
Steering gear
(87% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack (86% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.050% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.70% fail on
Steering linkage components
(66% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.55% fail on Attachment
-
0.45% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.45% fail on Registration plates
-
0.10% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.10% fail on Speedometer