BMW X6 MOT Results

Registered in 2016
87.0% pass rate
from 2,049 tests in 2020
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.7% fail on Tyres (91% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.049% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 1.7% fail on Visibility (40% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wipers
    • 0.29% fail on Washers (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.049% fail on Window
    • 0.049% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.7% fail on Identification of the vehicle (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plates (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Headlamp aim (65% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.20% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.049% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.15% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.15% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.049% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.049% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.049% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.049% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.049% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 0.59% fail on Brakes (71% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Mechanical brake components (69% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Brake linings and pads (66% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Brake pads (66% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Brake performance
      • 0.098% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.098% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.049% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.049% fail on Rbt
          • 0.049% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.049% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.049% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.049% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
  • 0.49% fail on Suspension
    • 0.34% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.098% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.049% fail on Springs
      • 0.049% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.049% fail on Coil spring
  • 0.44% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.098% fail on Condition
  • 0.34% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.29% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.20% fail on Condition
      • 0.049% fail on Attachment
      • 0.049% fail on Requirements
      • 0.049% fail on Load limiters
    • 0.049% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.20% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.20% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.20% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.049% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.049% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.049% fail on Exhaust system
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages