BMW X6 MOT Results

Registered in 2009
74.2% pass rate
from 1,047 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X6 is unusually good or bad.

  • 11% fail on Suspension (24% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Springs
      • 6.0% fail on Coil springs
        • 6.0% fail on Coil spring
    • 3.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.2% fail on Ball joint
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.19% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
  • 7.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.6% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.8% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Brake performance (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.86% fail on Service brake performance (65% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Rbt (76% better than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.096% fail on Rbt
          • 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Brake linings and pads (53% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.86% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.29% fail on Brake discs and drums (75% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.096% fail on Cable
    • 0.86% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.86% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic braking system (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
    • 0.096% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 3.4% fail on Visibility (42% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.38% fail on Wipers (86% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.096% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.096% fail on View to rear
      • 0.096% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.96% fail on Body, chassis, structure (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Transmission (65% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Drive shafts (69% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Joints (68% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.096% fail on Joints
    • 0.096% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.096% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.096% fail on Undertray
  • 0.96% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (78% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Exhaust emissions (79% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.67% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.19% fail on Spark ignition (93% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.096% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.096% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.096% fail on Undertray
  • 0.96% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.96% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.76% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.76% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.096% fail on Steering
    • 0.096% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.096% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

  • BMW X6 (2008 - 2014)
    Unique coupe and SUV style. Drives and handles astonishingly well for a big vehicle. M50d has monstrous 381PS and 740Nm torque.

    Search Good Garages