BMW X6 MOT Results
Registered in 200974.2% pass rate
from 1,047 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X6 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(24% better than other 2009 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Springs
-
6.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.0% fail on Coil spring
-
6.0% fail on
Coil springs
-
3.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.2% fail on Ball joint
- 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.096% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.19% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
-
6.0% fail on
Springs
-
7.0% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(45% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp
- 0.57% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (29 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.6% fail on
Headlamp aim
(48% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.3% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.096% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.19% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.19% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.096% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.096% fail on Reversing lamps
-
3.2% fail on
Headlamps
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 2.6% fail on Tread depth
-
3.8% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.29% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.86% fail on
Service brake performance
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Decelerometer
(19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (20 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.096% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
- 0.096% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
Rbt
-
1.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(62% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(53% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Brake pads (58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Brake linings
-
0.29% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(75% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake discs (75% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.096% fail on Cable
-
0.96% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(53% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.86% fail on Electronic parking brake (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.29% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.19% fail on Electronic braking system (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.19% fail on Pedal
-
0.096% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.096% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
2.5% fail on
Brake performance
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Visibility
(42% better than other 2009 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Washers
- 0.38% fail on Wipers (86% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.096% fail on Windscreen
-
0.096% fail on
View to rear
- 0.096% fail on Mirrors
-
0.96% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(80% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Transmission
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Joints (68% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.096% fail on Joints
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
(69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.096% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.096% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.096% fail on Undertray
-
0.67% fail on
Transmission
(65% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(78% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.29% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.19% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.096% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.096% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Spark ignition
(93% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.096% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.67% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.096% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.096% fail on Undertray
-
0.86% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(79% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.96% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.76% fail on Registration plates
-
0.096% fail on
Steering
-
0.096% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.096% fail on Steering rack
-
0.096% fail on
Steering gear
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW X6 (2008 - 2014)
Unique coupe and SUV style. Drives and handles astonishingly well for a big vehicle. M50d has monstrous 381PS and 740Nm torque.