BMW X5 MOT Results
Registered in 201786.5% pass rate
from 6,545 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X5 is unusually good or bad.
-
6.5% fail on
Tyres
(91% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.015% fail on Size/type
-
3.7% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (21% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Washers (59% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.092% fail on Windscreen
- 0.015% fail on Window
- 0.015% fail on Bonnet
-
1.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(44% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.95% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.061% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.21% fail on
Headlamps
(58% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.061% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.015% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.95% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Brakes
(63% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Brake pads (69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake discs (64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.14% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.046% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.015% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.015% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.015% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.031% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.015% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.015% fail on
Rbt
- 0.015% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.015% fail on
Rbt
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.031% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.031% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.031% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.031% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.015% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.015% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.46% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Suspension
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.12% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(57 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Bellows (264 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Suspension unit (77 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.046% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.031% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
- 0.015% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.015% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
-
0.20% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.40% fail on
Road Wheels
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Attachment (100% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.20% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.20% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.26% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.11% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.046% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.076% fail on
Spark ignition
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
-
0.031% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.015% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.015% fail on Other leaks
-
0.23% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(56% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.092% fail on Joints
-
0.031% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.015% fail on Joints
- 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.015% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.015% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.12% fail on
Transmission
-
0.031% fail on
Steering
(80% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.031% fail on Locking devices (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW X5 (2014 - 2018)
Impressive interior quality and exceptionally comfortable, handles very well for such a big vehicle, available as a two-wheel drive 25d model with strong fuel economy.