BMW X5 MOT Results
Registered in 201585.3% pass rate
from 7,309 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X5 is unusually good or bad.
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
(56% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Condition (130% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Tread depth
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
(25% better than other 2015 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.48% fail on Washers (65% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
(140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Bonnet
-
0.014% fail on
View to rear
- 0.014% fail on Mirrors
-
2.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.92% fail on
Headlamp aim
(44% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Headlamp aim (40% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Direction indicators
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.62% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Side repeaters (81% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.014% fail on Switch
-
0.62% fail on
Flashing type
(48% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Headlamps
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (88% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (85% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Rear fog lamp (83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(83% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.014% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.014% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.92% fail on
Headlamp aim
(44% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
(63% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.64% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(67% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Brake pads (67% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(67% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Brake performance
(52% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.33% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.055% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
- 0.096% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.027% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.014% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
- 0.014% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.014% fail on
Rbt
-
0.40% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.082% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.041% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.027% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.014% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.055% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.055% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.041% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.041% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.027% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.014% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.014% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.014% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.014% fail on Other components
-
0.64% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(71% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension
(62% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Pins and bushes (69% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.014% fail on Suspension arm
-
0.37% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
(79 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Bellows (199 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Operation (65 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Suspension unit (62 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.068% fail on
Springs
(96% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Coil spring (96% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Coil springs
(96% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(77% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.027% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.041% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.041% fail on
Suspension rods
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint
- 0.014% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.041% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.041% fail on Ball joint
-
0.53% fail on
Suspension arms
(44% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Registration plates (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.55% fail on
Road Wheels
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Attachment (170% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(60% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Transmission
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.22% fail on Joints
-
0.014% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.014% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.22% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.041% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Body
- 0.027% fail on Other body component
-
0.027% fail on
Seats
- 0.027% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.014% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.014% fail on System
-
0.014% fail on
Doors
-
0.014% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.014% fail on Door condition
-
0.014% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.014% fail on Undertray
-
0.23% fail on
Transmission
-
0.37% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(68% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Compression ignition
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.068% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.014% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.014% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.014% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.096% fail on
Spark ignition
(85% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (77% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Compression ignition
(46% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.027% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.014% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.014% fail on Other leaks
-
0.34% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(69% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.14% fail on Condition
- 0.014% fail on Attachment
- 0.014% fail on Requirements
- 0.014% fail on Pre-tensioners
- 0.14% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.14% fail on
Steering
(66% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
Steering linkage components
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Track rod end (74% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.014% fail on Drag link end
-
0.027% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.027% fail on Steering rack
-
0.014% fail on
Steering play
- 0.014% fail on Steering rack
-
0.096% fail on
Steering linkage components
(72% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW X5 (2014 - 2018)
Impressive interior quality and exceptionally comfortable, handles very well for such a big vehicle, available as a two-wheel drive 25d model with strong fuel economy.