MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » BMW » X1 » 2017

BMW X1 MOT Results

Registered in 2017
89.6% pass rate
from 14,275 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X1 is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.0% fail on Tyres (16% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Condition (51% worse than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (30% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Size/type
  • 2.5% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.042% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.57% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.27% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.27% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.24% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.035% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.11% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.035% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.035% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.035% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.021% fail on Horn
      • 0.0070% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.0070% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.021% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (85% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Rear fog lamp (85% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Switch
    • 0.014% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.0070% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.0070% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
    • 0.0070% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
  • 2.2% fail on Visibility (39% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wipers (56% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Washers
    • 0.084% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.084% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.014% fail on Bonnet
  • 0.67% fail on Brakes (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Mechanical brake components (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings and pads (62% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.48% fail on Brake pads (62% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Brake discs and drums (80% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Brake performance (75% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.084% fail on Service brake performance (70% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Rbt (72% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.063% fail on Service brake performance (73% better than other 2017 cars)
          • 0.014% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0070% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0070% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.021% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.014% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0070% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.0070% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.0070% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.0070% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.0070% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.0070% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.0070% fail on Pedal
    • 0.0070% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0070% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0070% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.0070% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0070% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 0.28% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.056% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.042% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.014% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.077% fail on Springs (77% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Coil springs (77% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Coil spring (77% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.028% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.021% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
    • 0.021% fail on Shock absorbers (80% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0070% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0070% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 0.22% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (60% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust emissions (64% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Compression ignition (48% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.014% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.0070% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.077% fail on Spark ignition (75% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2017 cars)
        • 0.0070% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.028% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.028% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.18% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.14% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Attachment
    • 0.028% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.0070% fail on Airbags
      • 0.0070% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.18% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.14% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Condition
  • 0.15% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Body, chassis, structure (52% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.056% fail on Engine mounting (13 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting condition (15 times worse than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.0070% fail on Bracket
    • 0.035% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2017 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.035% fail on Joints
    • 0.028% fail on Body
      • 0.028% fail on Other body component
    • 0.014% fail on Doors
      • 0.0070% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition
      • 0.0070% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.0070% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0070% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.0070% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.0070% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.0070% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.0070% fail on Bumpers
  • 0.028% fail on Steering (81% better than other 2017 cars)
    • 0.014% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0070% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0070% fail on Electronic power steering
Read the Honest John Review

  • BMW X1 (2015 - 2022)
    Practical, spacious and good to drive. Most engines offer strong performance and low running costs. Primarily front wheel drive. Well-equipped as standard.

    Search Good Garages