BMW X1 MOT Results
Registered in 201689.3% pass rate
from 12,737 tests in 2021
(36% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW X1 is unusually good or bad.
-
4.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.0% fail on Condition (41% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tread depth (42% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Size/type
-
2.1% fail on
Visibility
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Wipers (57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Washers (23% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.031% fail on Windscreen
-
0.016% fail on
View to rear
- 0.016% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0079% fail on Bonnet
-
1.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2016 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim (26% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.35% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.071% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.016% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.35% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.31% fail on
Headlamps
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp (55% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.055% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Rear fog lamp (75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.031% fail on Position lamp
-
0.031% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.016% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0079% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0079% fail on Horn
-
0.016% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.016% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.0079% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.0079% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.0079% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.0079% fail on Rear reflectors
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
(27% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Brakes
(66% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Brake pads (59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Brake discs (79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Brake performance
(85% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Service brake performance
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Service brake performance (91% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.031% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(86% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Rbt (sp) (89% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0079% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.016% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.0079% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake performance
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance (81% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.031% fail on
Service brake performance
(92% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.055% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.024% fail on Electronic braking system
- 0.016% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.039% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.031% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0079% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.024% fail on
Parking brake control
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.0079% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.0079% fail on Pedal
-
0.0079% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.0079% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0079% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.75% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Suspension
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Springs
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Coil spring (58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Mounting
-
0.49% fail on
Coil springs
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Suspension arms
(71% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Ball joint (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.063% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Linkage
- 0.024% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.0079% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0079% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.031% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.024% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0079% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.0079% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.49% fail on
Springs
(57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.30% fail on
Road Wheels
(58% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Attachment (80% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Condition
-
0.26% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
-
0.21% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.071% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.071% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (72% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0079% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.055% fail on
Spark ignition
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.047% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.0079% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.15% fail on
Compression ignition
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0079% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.0079% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.20% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(75% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Transmission
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.071% fail on
Drive shafts
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.071% fail on Joints (64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.0079% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.0079% fail on Joints
-
0.071% fail on
Drive shafts
(65% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.047% fail on
Engine mounting
(8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Engine mounting condition (8 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Bracket (9 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Body
- 0.016% fail on Other body component
- 0.0079% fail on Panel
- 0.016% fail on Bumpers
- 0.0079% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.0079% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.0079% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.0079% fail on
Seats
- 0.0079% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.079% fail on
Transmission
(64% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.086% fail on Condition
- 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.086% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.024% fail on
Steering
(91% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.0079% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.0079% fail on Track rod end
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW X1 (2015 - 2022)
Practical, spacious and good to drive. Most engines offer strong performance and low running costs. Primarily front wheel drive. Well-equipped as standard.