BMW 6-Series MOT Results
Registered in 200567.5% pass rate
from 1,561 tests in 2021
(27% better than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 6-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(25% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.5% fail on Ball joint (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.26% fail on Suspension arm
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (73% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.45% fail on Linkage ball joints (72% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Linkage
- 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.9% fail on
Springs
-
3.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.9% fail on Coil spring
-
3.9% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.51% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.26% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint
- 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings (87% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (78% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.064% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.064% fail on Pins and bushes
-
6.1% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.5% fail on
Brakes
(29% better than other 2005 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.70% fail on
Service brake performance
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Service brake performance (82% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Parking brake performance
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
0.70% fail on
Rbt
(54% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.19% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance (73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(79% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(52% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Brake pads (60% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Brake linings
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs
-
0.90% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.83% fail on Lever
-
0.45% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.45% fail on Hand lever
-
0.32% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(78% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system (73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.064% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.064% fail on Leaks
-
0.064% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.064% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
4.4% fail on
Brake performance
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(53% better than other 2005 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.7% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.4% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.58% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (75% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Stop lamp (92% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
(80% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Horn
-
0.064% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.064% fail on Position lamp
-
0.064% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.064% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.064% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
2.1% fail on
Headlamps
(59% better than other 2005 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Condition
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.064% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Visibility
(39% better than other 2005 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Washers
- 1.2% fail on Wipers (68% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.13% fail on Windscreen
-
0.064% fail on
View to rear
- 0.064% fail on Mirrors
-
4.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(37% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.83% fail on Catalyst emissions (62% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.064% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.064% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.064% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Spark ignition
(31% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.77% fail on Engine oil leaks (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
3.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(44% better than other 2005 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (97% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.064% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Steering
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.0% fail on Track rod end
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Electronic power steering (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Steering gear
(73% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Steering rack
-
0.19% fail on
Power steering
- 0.13% fail on Operation
- 0.064% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.064% fail on Other components
-
0.13% fail on
Steering play
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
-
2.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
0.96% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.77% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
-
0.70% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(92% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
- 0.19% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.064% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.19% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.19% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.13% fail on
Doors
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.13% fail on Door condition
-
0.13% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.064% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.064% fail on Undertray
-
0.26% fail on
Seats
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW 6 Series (2004 - 2011)
An entertaining car along an open road. The M6 is a phenomenal drive.