BMW 5-Series MOT Results
Registered in 201788.4% pass rate
from 16,345 tests in 2021
(20% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 5-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
(46% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Condition (88% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
- 0.043% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.66% fail on
Headlamp aim
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Headlamp aim (48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.0061% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
(110% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.073% fail on
Headlamps
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.018% fail on Headlamp (96% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Stop lamp (78% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.037% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.037% fail on Position lamp
- 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.024% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.0061% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0061% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.018% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.018% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (91% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.0061% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.0061% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.0061% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.66% fail on
Headlamp aim
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.94% fail on
Visibility
(74% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Washers (52% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Wipers (86% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.080% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.080% fail on Windscreen
-
0.024% fail on
View to rear
- 0.024% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0061% fail on Bonnet
-
0.80% fail on
Brakes
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Brake pads (78% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(71% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Brake discs (71% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(78% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Brake performance
(35% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance (44% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0061% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0061% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0061% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.13% fail on
Rbt
(54% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.037% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt
- 0.037% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.037% fail on
Rbt
-
0.031% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.018% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.031% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.018% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Service brake performance
(50% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.098% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.049% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.043% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.024% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.024% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.024% fail on Pedal
- 0.0061% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.0061% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.0061% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.0061% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.36% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(76% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.68% fail on
Road Wheels
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Condition (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
-
0.60% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.56% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.33% fail on
Compression ignition
(54% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (92% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.012% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.0061% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.23% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.21% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.018% fail on Catalyst emissions (83% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Compression ignition
(54% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Noise suppression
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Undertray (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.018% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
0.56% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.42% fail on
Suspension
(52% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.061% fail on
Suspension arms
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Pins and bushes (80% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Ball joint (69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.061% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(55% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.031% fail on Linkage
- 0.018% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.0061% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.0061% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.0061% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.024% fail on
Springs
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.024% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.012% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.0061% fail on Suspension unit
- 0.0061% fail on Bellows
-
0.40% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(94% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Registration plates (94% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
(98% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Drive shafts
(90% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Joints (87% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.024% fail on
Prop shafts
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Flexible couplings (31 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Joints
-
0.18% fail on
Drive shafts
(90% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.024% fail on
Doors
-
0.018% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.018% fail on Door condition
-
0.0061% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.0061% fail on Door condition
-
0.018% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.012% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.012% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.012% fail on
Body
- 0.012% fail on Other body component
- 0.012% fail on Undertray
- 0.0061% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.20% fail on
Transmission
(98% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.086% fail on Condition
- 0.012% fail on Requirements
- 0.031% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (71% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.098% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.024% fail on
Steering
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.012% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0061% fail on Track rod end
-
0.0061% fail on
Other components
- 0.0061% fail on Steering component
- 0.0061% fail on Locking devices
-
0.0061% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.0061% fail on Operation
- 0.0061% fail on Steering rack
-
0.0061% fail on
Power steering
- 0.0061% fail on Other components
-
0.012% fail on
Steering linkage components
(88% better than other 2017 cars)
Read the Honest John Review