BMW 5-Series MOT Results
Registered in 199761.4% pass rate
from 700 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1997 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 5-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(26% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(99% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover (140% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Suspension arm
-
6.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover (13 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.29% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Linkage
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Springs
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.4% fail on Coil spring
-
2.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.71% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.57% fail on
Suspension rods
(4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint dust cover (22 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.43% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.29% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.29% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.29% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.14% fail on
Axles
- 0.14% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.14% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.14% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(99% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(46% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Parking brake performance
(170% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.14% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
3.1% fail on
Rbt
(180% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Service brake performance
(77% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Rbt
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(90% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(90% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.29% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(90% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
2.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.14% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.57% fail on Brake pads
-
0.43% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.43% fail on Brake discs
-
0.57% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.43% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.29% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.29% fail on Hand lever
-
0.14% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.14% fail on Servos
-
0.14% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.14% fail on Lever
-
0.14% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.14% fail on Servos
- 0.14% fail on Master cylinder
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(46% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
12% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
(63% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.7% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.86% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.86% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.86% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.71% fail on
Direction indicators
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.71% fail on
Flashing type
(70% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.14% fail on Horn
-
0.29% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.29% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.29% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
4.6% fail on
Headlamps
(63% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
10% fail on
Visibility
(47% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 9.0% fail on Washers (190% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.43% fail on Bonnet
-
0.14% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.14% fail on Windscreen
-
7.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.29% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.14% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.14% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.14% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.0% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.86% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.14% fail on Other leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(35% better than other 1997 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.6% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
(160% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Pipe (4 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Tank (3 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Chassis
- 1.3% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.86% fail on
Doors
-
0.57% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.57% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.57% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.57% fail on
Transmission
(78% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Joints (75% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Drive shafts
(76% better than other 1997 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 1997 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Body
- 0.29% fail on Panel
-
0.29% fail on
Boot lid
(6 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Boot lid condition (7 times worse than other 1997 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Floor
-
2.6% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
6.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(66% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 3.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 1997 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.1% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.57% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Airbags
- 0.14% fail on Drivers airbag
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
(57% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Tread depth
- 2.6% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
4.7% fail on
Steering
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Steering rack (170% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.86% fail on Track rod end
- 0.43% fail on Ball joint
- 0.29% fail on Drag link end
- 0.14% fail on Locking devices
-
0.43% fail on
Power steering
- 0.29% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Rams
-
0.14% fail on
Steering play
- 0.14% fail on Steering rack
-
2.9% fail on
Steering gear
(150% worse than other 1997 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.57% fail on Registration plates
-
0.57% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.57% fail on Attachment