BMW 5-Series MOT Results
Registered in 199561.2% pass rate
from 420 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 5-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 1.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.7% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Front fog lamps
- 0.24% fail on Front fog lamps
-
1.7% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.48% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.48% fail on Horn
-
0.24% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.24% fail on Position lamp
-
0.24% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.24% fail on Switch
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.48% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.24% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.24% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.1% fail on
Springs
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.4% fail on Coil spring
- 0.24% fail on Mounting
- 0.48% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.7% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.95% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.95% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.48% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.24% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
-
0.24% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.24% fail on Pipes
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(90% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
-
6.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.24% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.24% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt
-
1.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
3.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.95% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.48% fail on Pedal
- 0.48% fail on Hand lever
- 0.71% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.48% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.48% fail on Brake pads
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.24% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.24% fail on Lever
-
0.24% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.24% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.24% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.24% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.24% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.24% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
6.0% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.95% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.24% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.71% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.48% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.24% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
8.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.71% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.24% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.24% fail on Other leaks
-
9.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.0% fail on
Visibility
- 6.2% fail on Washers
- 4.3% fail on Wipers
-
6.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 2.9% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.71% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.48% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.24% fail on Pipe
-
0.48% fail on
Chassis
- 0.48% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.48% fail on
Transmission
(80% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.24% fail on Joints
-
0.24% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.24% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.24% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.24% fail on
Body
- 0.24% fail on Panel
-
0.24% fail on
Load security
-
0.24% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.24% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.24% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.24% fail on
Doors
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Door condition
-
0.24% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.24% fail on Floor
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.95% fail on Prescribed areas
- 0.48% fail on Condition
-
2.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.7% fail on Condition
- 0.95% fail on Tread depth
- 0.24% fail on Size/type
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
(61% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Other components
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.71% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.71% fail on Registration plates
-
0.48% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.48% fail on Attachment