BMW 5-Series MOT Results
Registered in 198972.1% pass rate
from 122 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 5-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
13% fail on
Suspension
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(200% worse than other 1989 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 2.5% fail on Ball joint
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 4.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (31 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.82% fail on
Springs
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.82% fail on Coil spring
-
0.82% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.82% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.82% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.82% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.82% fail on Ball joint
-
6.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(200% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
11% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.1% fail on Headlamp
-
3.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.82% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.82% fail on Horn
-
4.1% fail on
Headlamps
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
- 3.3% fail on Chassis condition
- 3.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.6% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.82% fail on Hose
- 0.82% fail on Pipe
-
1.6% fail on
Body
- 0.82% fail on Panel
- 0.82% fail on Other body component
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
-
0.82% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.82% fail on Door condition
-
0.82% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.82% fail on Door condition
-
0.82% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.82% fail on
Transmission
-
0.82% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.82% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.82% fail on
Prop shafts
-
0.82% fail on
Seats
- 0.82% fail on Driver's seat
-
3.3% fail on
Chassis
-
7.4% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 3.3% fail on Washers
-
0.82% fail on
View to rear
- 0.82% fail on Mirrors
-
4.9% fail on
Brakes
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.6% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
- 0.82% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.82% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.82% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.82% fail on
Rbt
-
0.82% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.82% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 0.82% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 0.82% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.82% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.82% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.82% fail on Other braking system component
-
0.82% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
3.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Steering
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 2.5% fail on Track rod end
-
0.82% fail on
Steering play
- 0.82% fail on Steering box
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.5% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Requirements
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
2.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.82% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.82% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.82% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.82% fail on Other leaks
-
1.6% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.6% fail on
Tyres
- 1.6% fail on Condition
- 0.82% fail on Tread depth