BMW 4-Series MOT Results
Registered in 201789.4% pass rate
from 4,716 tests in 2021
(30% better than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 4-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
4.2% fail on
Tyres
(23% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Condition (66% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Tread depth (40% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Size/type
-
1.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(49% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.91% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.91% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.19% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.021% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.19% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.13% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Headlamps
(79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.021% fail on Headlamp
- 0.021% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.021% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.021% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.021% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.021% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.021% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.91% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.2% fail on
Visibility
(67% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Washers
- 0.45% fail on Wipers (84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.064% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.064% fail on Windscreen
- 0.021% fail on Bonnet
-
1.1% fail on
Brakes
(48% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.21% fail on Brake discs
-
0.53% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(57% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.085% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.21% fail on
Rbt
-
0.085% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.085% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.064% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.042% fail on
Rbt
- 0.042% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.021% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.021% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.042% fail on
Rbt
- 0.021% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.042% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.021% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.021% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.021% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.021% fail on Pedal
-
0.021% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.021% fail on Lever
- 0.021% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.021% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.70% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Registration plates (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Attachment
-
0.32% fail on
Suspension
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.17% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.064% fail on Ball joint
- 0.042% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.021% fail on
Springs
-
0.021% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.021% fail on Coil spring
-
0.021% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.021% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint
-
0.23% fail on
Suspension arms
-
0.13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.064% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.085% fail on
Spark ignition
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.021% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.021% fail on Undertray
-
0.021% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
0.085% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(84% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.085% fail on
Steering
-
0.064% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.042% fail on Track rod end
- 0.021% fail on Ball joint
- 0.021% fail on Drag link end
-
0.021% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.021% fail on Steering rack
-
0.064% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.085% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.021% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.021% fail on Bumpers
-
0.021% fail on
Transmission
-
0.021% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.021% fail on Joints
-
0.021% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.021% fail on
Body
- 0.021% fail on Other body component
-
0.085% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.064% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.021% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.021% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW 4 Series (2013 - 2020)
Handles as impressively as you’d hope, handsome styling makes the newer 4 Series look fussy, wide range of strong petrol and diesel engines, plenty on the used market.