BMW 4-Series MOT Results
Registered in 201687.6% pass rate
from 6,103 tests in 2021
(33% better than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 4-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
(29% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Condition (81% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth (23% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.049% fail on Size/type
-
1.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(50% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.31% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.033% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.31% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.29% fail on
Headlamps
(59% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp (77% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.13% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.016% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.016% fail on Position lamp
- 0.016% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.3% fail on
Brakes
(53% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.75% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Brake pads (57% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Brake discs (76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(58% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Brake performance
(39% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance (56% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.11% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.066% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.066% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.016% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
- 0.016% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.016% fail on
Rbt
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
(56% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.082% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.066% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.016% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
-
0.049% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.049% fail on Lever
-
0.016% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.016% fail on Hand lever
-
0.016% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.016% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.016% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.75% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(61% better than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Visibility
(67% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Washers
- 0.41% fail on Wipers (86% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.049% fail on Windscreen
- 0.016% fail on Window
- 0.016% fail on Bonnet
-
0.67% fail on
Road Wheels
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(150% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Suspension
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension arms
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.016% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.066% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.033% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(84% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on Linkage
- 0.016% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.016% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.016% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.26% fail on
Suspension arms
(47% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(79% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.082% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 0.033% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.016% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.033% fail on
Compression ignition
(90% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.016% fail on Particulate filter
- 0.016% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.016% fail on
Emission control equipment
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
(69% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(78% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(76% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.066% fail on Joints
-
0.066% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.033% fail on Exhaust system (80% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.016% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.016% fail on Pipe
- 0.016% fail on Bumpers
-
0.066% fail on
Transmission
(70% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Steering
-
0.082% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.066% fail on Track rod end
- 0.016% fail on Ball joint
- 0.016% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.016% fail on
Steering play
- 0.016% fail on Steering rack
-
0.082% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.049% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(83% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.033% fail on
Seat belts
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.033% fail on Condition (79% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.016% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.033% fail on
Seat belts
(80% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW 4 Series (2013 - 2020)
Handles as impressively as you’d hope, handsome styling makes the newer 4 Series look fussy, wide range of strong petrol and diesel engines, plenty on the used market.