BMW 3-Series MOT Results
Registered in 199960.1% pass rate
from 4,339 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 3-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
16% fail on
Suspension
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Pins and bushes (66% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover (44% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
4.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.62% fail on Ball joint dust cover (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.51% fail on Linkage ball joints (43% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Ball joint
- 0.21% fail on Linkage
- 0.12% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.023% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.7% fail on
Springs
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.6% fail on Coil spring
- 0.092% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.6% fail on
Coil springs
- 2.7% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (43% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (82% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Wheel bearings (39% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.25% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.14% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.046% fail on Sub-frame
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint
- 0.069% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.12% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.069% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.023% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint
-
0.069% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.046% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.023% fail on Ball joint
-
7.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(63% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Brakes
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (48% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(23% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
(23% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance (27% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.046% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.046% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.023% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.023% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.1% fail on
Rbt
(23% better than other 1999 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(65% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (49% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (130% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.092% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.069% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.046% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.046% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(62% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(71% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Service brake performance (58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.51% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes (28% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Electronic braking system
-
2.0% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
0.44% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.41% fail on Brake discs (45% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Brake drums
-
0.092% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.046% fail on Lever
- 0.023% fail on Cable
- 0.023% fail on Linkage
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.51% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.23% fail on Lever
-
0.21% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.12% fail on Hand lever
- 0.092% fail on Pedal
-
0.18% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.16% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.16% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.092% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.069% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.069% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
-
0.046% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.023% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.023% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.023% fail on Other components
-
0.046% fail on
Prescribed areas
-
7.7% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Headlamp aim (24% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.6% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.4% fail on Headlamp
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.023% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.32% fail on Side repeaters (49% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.14% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.92% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (38% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(39% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(38% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Rear fog lamp (38% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(38% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Electrical equipment
(46% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Horn
- 0.14% fail on Battery(ies) (68% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
-
0.35% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(160% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Main beam tell-tale (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.21% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.21% fail on Switch
-
0.14% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
- 0.046% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(21% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.0% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Washers (47% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Wipers (21% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Bonnet
-
0.18% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
0.092% fail on
View to rear
- 0.092% fail on Mirrors
- 0.023% fail on Driver's view
-
7.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(75% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(44% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas (42% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Condition
- 0.023% fail on Requirements
-
0.30% fail on
Airbags
(2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Passengers airbag
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(16% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(18% better than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(15% better than other 1999 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (23% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (110% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.18% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.14% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.21% fail on
Compression ignition
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.069% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.046% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.046% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.046% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.046% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.023% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
(15% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.74% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.67% fail on Engine oil leaks (78% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.023% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
- 0.023% fail on Other leaks
-
0.046% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.046% fail on Sound deadening material (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(18% better than other 1999 cars)
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
(26% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Size/type
-
4.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(54% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (56% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(30% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (29% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Chassis
(51% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Chassis condition (50% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Doors
-
0.18% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.16% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.16% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.41% fail on
Body
- 0.23% fail on Panel
- 0.16% fail on Other body component
- 0.023% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.28% fail on
Transmission
(90% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
(95% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Joints (96% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.046% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.14% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.092% fail on Prop shaft
- 0.046% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.14% fail on
Drive shafts
(95% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Fuel system
(58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.069% fail on Pipe
- 0.046% fail on System
- 0.023% fail on Hose
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.092% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.023% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.069% fail on Bumpers
- 0.069% fail on Floor
-
0.046% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.046% fail on Bracket
- 0.046% fail on Undertray
-
0.023% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.023% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.023% fail on
Cabs
- 0.023% fail on Prescribed areas
-
2.4% fail on
Steering
(34% better than other 1999 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Track rod end (41% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.12% fail on Drag link end
- 0.046% fail on Locking devices
-
0.67% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.67% fail on Steering rack
-
0.30% fail on
Power steering
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.092% fail on Operation
- 0.046% fail on Pump
- 0.046% fail on Other components
-
0.12% fail on
Steering play
- 0.12% fail on Steering rack
- 0.069% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.046% fail on Steering column
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(40% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.60% fail on Registration plates
-
0.39% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.35% fail on Attachment
- 0.046% fail on Condition
-
0.023% fail on
Buses and coaches supplementary tests
-
0.023% fail on
Doors
- 0.023% fail on Emergency exits
-
0.023% fail on
Doors