BMW 3-Series MOT Results
Registered in 199564.4% pass rate
from 1,089 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 3-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
15% fail on
Suspension
(27% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Pins and bushes (83% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.18% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 4.8% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.8% fail on
Springs
(130% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
2.7% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.092% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.28% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.092% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.092% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.092% fail on
Axles
- 0.092% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
0.092% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.092% fail on Pins and bushes
-
5.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(95% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.0% fail on Stop lamp (87% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp
- 0.64% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.46% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.092% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.1% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.55% fail on Horn
- 0.46% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.092% fail on Electrical wiring
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp (55% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Switch
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.64% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (60% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.28% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.18% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.18% fail on Position lamp
-
0.092% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.092% fail on Switch
-
12% fail on
Brakes
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.092% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
- 0.092% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
2.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
- 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.37% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
-
2.0% fail on
Parking brake performance
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.092% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.092% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.092% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(120% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(50% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.73% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.092% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.092% fail on
Plate brake tester (sp)
- 0.092% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(54% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.46% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
3.8% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (82% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(180% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.46% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.46% fail on Brake pads
-
0.18% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.18% fail on Brake discs
-
0.092% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.092% fail on Lever
-
0.46% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.46% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.46% fail on Lever
- 0.37% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.37% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.28% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
- 0.092% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.18% fail on Hand lever
- 0.092% fail on Pedal
-
0.28% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.092% fail on Valves
-
0.092% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.092% fail on Other components
-
7.4% fail on
Brake performance
-
7.8% fail on
Visibility
- 4.8% fail on Washers
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 0.46% fail on Bonnet
- 0.092% fail on Driver's view
-
0.092% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.092% fail on Windscreen
-
7.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(27% better than other 1995 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.0% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 2.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.83% fail on
Doors
-
0.37% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.37% fail on Door condition
-
0.28% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.28% fail on Door condition
-
0.18% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.18% fail on Door condition
-
0.37% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.64% fail on
Chassis
(60% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Chassis condition (60% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.46% fail on
Seats
- 0.46% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.37% fail on
Transmission
(84% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Joints (90% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.092% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.092% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.28% fail on
Drive shafts
(86% better than other 1995 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.092% fail on Hose
- 0.092% fail on Pipe
- 0.18% fail on Bumpers
-
0.18% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.092% fail on Engine mounting condition
- 0.092% fail on Bracket
-
0.18% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.092% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.092% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.092% fail on
Body
- 0.092% fail on Other body component
- 0.092% fail on Floor
-
0.092% fail on
Cabs
- 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.3% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.37% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.37% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.18% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.18% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.092% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.092% fail on Emissions not tested
-
6.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.18% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.092% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.092% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
6.7% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.9% fail on
Tyres
- 2.1% fail on Tread depth
- 1.8% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
-
3.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.3% fail on Steering rack
-
1.3% fail on
Steering linkage components
(52% better than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint
-
0.83% fail on
Power steering
- 0.28% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.28% fail on Other components
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.092% fail on Rams
- 0.18% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.092% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.092% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.092% fail on Universal joint
-
0.092% fail on
Steering play
- 0.092% fail on Steering rack
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (180% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(49% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.92% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 1995 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Airbags
(5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Drivers airbag (5 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.73% fail on Registration plates
- 0.092% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.37% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.37% fail on Attachment