BMW 3-Series M3 MOT Results
Registered in 201085.9% pass rate
from 683 tests in 2021
(63% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 3-Series M3 is unusually good or bad.
-
4.1% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Side repeaters (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
2.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamps
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Headlamp (79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
0.15% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Electrical wiring
-
2.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.8% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth (61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
(58% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Electronic stability control (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.2% fail on
Rbt
-
0.15% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.15% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.15% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.15% fail on
Decelerometer
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.15% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.15% fail on Hand lever
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.15% fail on Lever
-
0.15% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.15% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.15% fail on Brake discs
-
0.15% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
1.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.59% fail on
Emission control equipment
(41 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Catalytic converter (62 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.8% fail on
Visibility
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Washers
- 0.44% fail on Wipers (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Springs
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Coil spring (92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Coil springs
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.15% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.29% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.29% fail on Registration plates
-
0.29% fail on
Steering
(88% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.15% fail on Steering rack
-
0.15% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.15% fail on Track rod end
-
0.15% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.29% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.15% fail on
Airbags
- 0.15% fail on Passengers airbag
- 0.15% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Airbags
-
0.29% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
BMW M3 (2007 - 2013)
Stormingly fast performance. Superb V8 engine sound. High quality interior. Great feelgood factor, yet still docile at low speeds. Available as coupe, convertible or saloon.