BMW 3-Series M3 MOT Results
Registered in 199672.0% pass rate
from 200 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 3-Series M3 is unusually good or bad.
-
9.5% fail on
Visibility
- 6.5% fail on Washers
- 3.5% fail on Wipers
- 0.50% fail on Bonnet
-
9.5% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.5% fail on
Spark ignition
- 7.5% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
-
8.5% fail on
Spark ignition
-
1.5% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.5% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.50% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.50% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
8.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 3.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp
-
2.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.50% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.0% fail on Horn
-
0.50% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.50% fail on Switch
-
0.50% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
8.0% fail on
Brakes
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Service brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.5% fail on
Rbt
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.0% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.50% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.50% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.50% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.50% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
- 3.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.50% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.50% fail on Pedal
-
0.50% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.50% fail on Lever
-
0.50% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.50% fail on Brake fluid
-
3.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
(51% better than other 1996 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
2.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Linkage
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint
- 0.50% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
1.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.0% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.0% fail on
Springs
-
1.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.0% fail on Coil spring
-
1.0% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.50% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.50% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.50% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.5% fail on
Steering
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.5% fail on Track rod end
-
0.50% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.50% fail on Steering rack
-
0.50% fail on
Power steering
- 0.50% fail on Pump
-
1.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
2.5% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(74% better than other 1996 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Chassis
- 1.0% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.50% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.50% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 0.50% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.50% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.50% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.50% fail on
Body
- 0.50% fail on Other body component
-
1.0% fail on
Chassis
-
2.0% fail on
Tyres
- 1.0% fail on Condition
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth
-
1.0% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.50% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.50% fail on Registration plates