BMW 3-Series M3 MOT Results
Registered in 199574.7% pass rate
from 166 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 3-Series M3 is unusually good or bad.
-
11% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Catalyst emissions (98% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Emission control equipment
(6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Catalytic converter (7 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.60% fail on Emissions not tested
-
11% fail on
Spark ignition
(84% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.60% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.8% fail on Headlamp
- 1.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 1.2% fail on Horn
-
3.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.0% fail on
Brakes
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
1.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.60% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.60% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
- 0.60% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
- 1.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.2% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.60% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.60% fail on Servos
-
3.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
6.0% fail on
Suspension
-
3.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.60% fail on
Springs
-
0.60% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.60% fail on Coil spring
-
0.60% fail on
Coil springs
-
0.60% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.60% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.60% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
3.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.4% fail on
Visibility
- 3.0% fail on Wipers
- 3.0% fail on Washers
-
4.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.2% fail on Track rod end
- 0.60% fail on Ball joint
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
0.60% fail on
Power steering
- 0.60% fail on Other components
- 0.60% fail on Steering wheel
-
1.8% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
3.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(69% better than other 1995 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.60% fail on Floor
-
1.2% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
1.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Registration plates
-
0.60% fail on
Tyres
- 0.60% fail on Condition