BMW 1-Series MOT Results
Registered in 201070.4% pass rate
from 27,055 tests in 2021
(22% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 1-Series is unusually good or bad.
-
7.5% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(37% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Headlamps
(26% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Headlamp levelling device (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.0037% fail on Dipswitch
- 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.0037% fail on Switch
-
0.0037% fail on
Semaphore
- 0.0037% fail on Arm
-
1.4% fail on
Flashing type
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.22% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.0037% fail on Reversing lamp switch
-
0.18% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.100% fail on Position lamp
- 0.022% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on All position lamps
-
0.089% fail on
Electrical equipment
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Electrical wiring (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.022% fail on Horn (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Battery(ies) (91% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors (77% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.015% fail on Main beam tell-tale
- 0.015% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.011% fail on
Hazard warning
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Switch (78% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
7.0% fail on
Tyres
(16% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
6.5% fail on
Suspension
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.68% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.011% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.64% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Linkage ball joints (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Ball joint (76% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Linkage (78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.018% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0074% fail on Pins and bushes (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0037% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.39% fail on
Springs
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Coil spring (93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.39% fail on
Coil springs
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings (66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.070% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Ball joint
- 0.0037% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.052% fail on
Macpherson strut
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pins and bushes (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Macpherson strut (69% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.052% fail on
Other suspension component
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint (88% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.0037% fail on Other suspension component
-
0.037% fail on
Sub-frames
(83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Sub-frame (87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Pins and bushes (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.0037% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.0074% fail on
Axles
(95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (95% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0074% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.0074% fail on Suspension unit
-
6.2% fail on
Brakes
(21% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(13% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Brake linings
-
0.68% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Brake discs (40% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
(79% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Cable (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Lever
- 0.0037% fail on Relay lever
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(13% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Brake performance
(33% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (15% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
-
1.1% fail on
Service brake performance
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.98% fail on Service brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance (55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.022% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.018% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.0037% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.0074% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.0074% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.1% fail on
Rbt
(45% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Parking brake performance
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.022% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.011% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0037% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.0037% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.0037% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.34% fail on
Rbt
(55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.089% fail on Service brake imbalance (80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Service brake performance (60% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.074% fail on Brake performance not tested (46% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(19% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(75% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.84% fail on Anti-lock braking system (80% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Electronic stability control (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Electronic braking system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Rigid brake pipes (66% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.13% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.0037% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
-
0.10% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.085% fail on Hand lever (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Pedal (87% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.10% fail on
Parking brake control
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Lever (66% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.030% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.0037% fail on Reservoirs
-
0.015% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.015% fail on Servos (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.011% fail on Other components
-
0.0037% fail on
Low pressure warning
- 0.0037% fail on Air and vacuum systems
-
0.0037% fail on
Hand operated control valves
- 0.0037% fail on Operation
-
2.8% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
5.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.9% fail on Washers (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wipers (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.45% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
View to rear
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
- 0.011% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.12% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
- 0.0037% fail on Window
- 0.015% fail on Driver's view
-
2.6% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(26% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.62% fail on Catalyst emissions (33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested (54% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0037% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0037% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0037% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.81% fail on
Compression ignition
(35% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (33% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Emissions not tested (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.21% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Emission control equipment
(150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Particulate filter (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.0074% fail on Other emission control equipment
- 0.030% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
-
1.7% fail on
Spark ignition
(17% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Fluid leaks
(70% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.055% fail on Engine oil leaks (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0037% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.0037% fail on Other leaks
-
0.018% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.015% fail on Undertray
- 0.0037% fail on Sound deadening material
-
2.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(23% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Exhaust system (17% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.0074% fail on Tank (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0037% fail on Pipe
- 0.0037% fail on System
-
0.11% fail on
Transmission
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.052% fail on Joints (97% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.041% fail on Drive shaft (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Prop shafts
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.0074% fail on Prop shaft
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.070% fail on Bumpers
-
0.044% fail on
Doors
(76% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Other passenger's door
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Door condition (72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Driver's door
(71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Door condition (68% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Front passenger's door
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Door condition (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.018% fail on
Other passenger's door
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.041% fail on
Body
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.037% fail on Other body component
- 0.0037% fail on Panel
-
0.026% fail on
Seats
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.011% fail on Driver's seat (77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.026% fail on Undertray
-
0.011% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.011% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.0037% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.0037% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.0037% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0037% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
1.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(28% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.84% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Seat belts
(25% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Condition
- 0.018% fail on Requirements
- 0.0074% fail on Attachment
-
0.015% fail on
Airbags
- 0.011% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.0037% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.88% fail on
Road Wheels
(90% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Attachment (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Condition
- 0.0037% fail on Hubs
-
0.54% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(28% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Registration plates (29% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Steering
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Track rod end (90% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Steering arm
- 0.011% fail on Ball joint (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Locking devices
-
0.0037% fail on
Other components
- 0.0037% fail on Steering linkage
-
0.085% fail on
Steering gear
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.078% fail on Steering rack (73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0074% fail on Operation
- 0.030% fail on Electronic power steering
-
0.018% fail on
Power steering
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Operation
- 0.0037% fail on Other components
-
0.018% fail on
Steering play
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.018% fail on Steering rack (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0037% fail on Steering wheel
-
0.20% fail on
Steering linkage components
(89% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0074% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.0074% fail on Belt(s)/padding
-
0.0037% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.0037% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review