MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » BMW » 1-Series » 2004

BMW 1-Series MOT Results

Registered in 2004
60.6% pass rate
from 3,326 tests in 2021
(16% better than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the BMW 1-Series is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (24% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 5.4% fail on Direction indicators (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Flashing type (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Individual direction indicators (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.63% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Side repeaters (66% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamps (51% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp (50% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Headlamp levelling device (74% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.5% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (37% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (67% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Rear fog lamp (67% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.24% fail on Horn
      • 0.12% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.030% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.15% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.12% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.030% fail on All position lamps
  • 11% fail on Brakes (22% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (41% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.42% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake performance (48% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (46% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance (50% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.12% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.27% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (76% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.27% fail on Rbt (sp) (75% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance (75% better than other 2004 cars)
          • 0.090% fail on Service brake performance (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.3% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Anti-lock braking system (86% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic stability control (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic braking system (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.5% fail on Brake pads
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.90% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.90% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.060% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.060% fail on Lever
    • 1.2% fail on Flexible brake hoses (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Rigid brake pipes (80% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.27% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.24% fail on Lever
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.12% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.060% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.060% fail on Servos
    • 0.030% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.030% fail on Servos
    • 0.030% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.030% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Suspension (39% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Suspension arms (35% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (67% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.21% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.12% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 2.3% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Sub-frame (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Springs (65% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Coil springs (65% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Coil spring (64% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (76% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Linkage ball joints (65% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (85% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint (63% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage (70% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings (65% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.090% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.15% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.030% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.030% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.030% fail on Axles
      • 0.030% fail on Axle
    • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.030% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 8.6% fail on Visibility
    • 6.0% fail on Washers (65% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Wipers (56% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.30% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.060% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.030% fail on View to rear
      • 0.030% fail on Mirrors
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 4.8% fail on Tread depth (35% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.090% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (120% worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Seat belts (44% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Condition
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements
      • 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment
      • 0.030% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.18% fail on Airbags (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
  • 4.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (48% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (49% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Catalyst emissions (77% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on Emissions not tested (62% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.030% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 1.2% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.42% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.42% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.060% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.030% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.030% fail on Exhaust gas recirculation valve
        • 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.060% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.030% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
    • 0.84% fail on Fluid leaks (67% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Engine oil leaks (100% worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.12% fail on Noise suppression (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Undertray (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 2.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (73% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Exhaust system (65% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Transmission (86% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.18% fail on Prop shaft (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Joints
        • 0.030% fail on Flexible couplings
        • 0.030% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.21% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Drive shaft (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Joints (98% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.24% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.060% fail on Tank
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.12% fail on Integral vehicle structure (86% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.060% fail on Sub-frame condition
        • 0.030% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.030% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.090% fail on Chassis (82% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Chassis condition (82% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Undertray
    • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.030% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.030% fail on Body
      • 0.030% fail on Panel
    • 0.030% fail on Load security
      • 0.030% fail on Access panel
    • 0.030% fail on Seats
      • 0.030% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.030% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.030% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.9% fail on Steering (59% better than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.90% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.84% fail on Steering linkage components (74% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Track rod end (78% better than other 2004 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.090% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.030% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.18% fail on Power steering
      • 0.12% fail on Operation
      • 0.060% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.030% fail on Other components
    • 0.030% fail on Steering lock
  • 1.4% fail on Road Wheels (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
    • 0.090% fail on Condition
  • 0.75% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.75% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.030% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.030% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review

  • BMW 1 Series (2004 - 2011)
    Great to drive and superbly built. Wide choice of models, improved from 2007 with Efficient Dynamics. 118d is super economical.

    Search Good Garages