Bedford Rascal MOT Results
Registered in 198956.5% pass rate
from 85 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Bedford Rascal is unusually good or bad.
-
19% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
9.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 9.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 4.7% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.5% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
3.5% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp
-
1.2% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.2% fail on Position lamp
- 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.4% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
18% fail on
Brakes
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(200% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
-
9.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Service brake performance
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
- 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
7.1% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
- 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
9.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(200% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 1.2% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
- 1.2% fail on Servos
-
1.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.2% fail on Brake pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 1989 cars)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
- 9.4% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Washers
-
1.2% fail on
View to rear
- 1.2% fail on Mirrors
-
12% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.4% fail on
Chassis
- 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.2% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.2% fail on Pipe
- 1.2% fail on Bumpers
-
1.2% fail on
Seats
- 1.2% fail on Driver's seat
-
3.5% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
-
9.4% fail on
Suspension
- 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
-
1.2% fail on
Springs
- 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
-
1.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
-
8.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
- 4.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
- 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Spark ignition
-
8.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.2% fail on Condition
-
2.4% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.2% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.2% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
1.2% fail on
Steering
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.2% fail on Steering box
-
1.2% fail on
Steering gear
-
1.2% fail on
Tyres
- 1.2% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth