Bedford Rascal MOT Results

Registered in 1989
56.5% pass rate
from 85 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Bedford Rascal is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.7% fail on Horn (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (200% worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 9.4% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
          • 7.1% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
          • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
      • 7.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 7.1% fail on Rbt
          • 4.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 1.2% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.2% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 1.2% fail on Pressure/vacuum build up
      • 1.2% fail on Servos
    • 1.2% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads
  • 13% fail on Visibility
    • 9.4% fail on Wipers (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Washers
    • 1.2% fail on View to rear
      • 1.2% fail on Mirrors
  • 12% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 3.5% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.4% fail on Chassis
      • 2.4% fail on Chassis condition
    • 1.2% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.2% fail on Pipe
    • 1.2% fail on Bumpers
    • 1.2% fail on Seats
      • 1.2% fail on Driver's seat
  • 9.4% fail on Suspension
    • 5.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.2% fail on Springs
      • 1.2% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
  • 8.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.7% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 3.5% fail on Emissions not tested (6 times worse than other 1989 cars)
  • 2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.4% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.2% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.2% fail on Condition
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 1.2% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 1.2% fail on Steering
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear
      • 1.2% fail on Steering box
  • 1.2% fail on Tyres
    • 1.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.2% fail on Tread depth

Search Good Garages