Bedford Rascal MOT Results

Registered in 1989
68.6% pass rate
from 118 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1989 cars and highlighted areas where the Bedford Rascal is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 5.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 4.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.7% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.85% fail on All direction indicators
    • 5.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 5.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 5.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 4.2% fail on Horn
      • 0.85% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.85% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.85% fail on Switch
    • 0.85% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.85% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 10% fail on Brake performance
      • 10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
          • 6.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
          • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.85% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.85% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 1.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.85% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.85% fail on Lever
    • 0.85% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.85% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.85% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.85% fail on Brake drums
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension
    • 4.2% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.5% fail on Springs
      • 1.7% fail on Leaf springs (19 times worse than other 1989 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Fixings and fixing bolts
        • 0.85% fail on Shackle pins and bushes
      • 0.85% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.85% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.85% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.85% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.85% fail on Other suspension component
  • 5.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.7% fail on Pipe
      • 0.85% fail on Hose
      • 0.85% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Body (4 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Panel (7 times worse than other 1989 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Other body component
    • 0.85% fail on Cabs
      • 0.85% fail on Steps
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
  • 5.1% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 5.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 5.1% fail on Spark ignition
        • 4.2% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.85% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.5% fail on Prescribed areas (12 times worse than other 1989 cars)
    • 0.85% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.85% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Condition
  • 0.85% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.85% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.85% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.85% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.85% fail on Prescribed areas

Search Good Garages