Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 2010

85.2% pass rate

from 5,847 tests in 2017

(49% better than other 2010 cars)

Pass rate by mileage

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

5.3% fail on Tyres (22% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
- 0.051% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.051% fail on Size/type
4.4% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Position lamps (57% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.91% fail on Front lamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.82% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.31% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.14% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.086% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.051% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.086% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
    - 0.068% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    - 0.017% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.43% fail on Direction indicators (72% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.43% fail on Flashing type (72% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Rear fog lamp
  - 0.36% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Horn
- 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
2.6% fail on Suspension (68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (30% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  - 0.086% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.74% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.72% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.051% fail on Location
- 0.63% fail on Shock absorbers (40% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.63% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Wheel bearings (73% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.086% fail on Front
- 0.051% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (97% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.017% fail on Condition
- 0.051% fail on Drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.051% fail on Front drive shafts (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.051% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Macpherson strut
  - 0.034% fail on Condition
- 0.017% fail on Tie bars/rods
  - 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.017% fail on Front suspension joints
2.4% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Hub components (46% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 1.4% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.17% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.017% fail on Brake linings
  - 0.017% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.84% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.36% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.27% fail on Front wheels (57% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.017% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.10% fail on Hydraulic systems (81% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.068% fail on Components (84% better than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.068% fail on Hoses
  - 0.017% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
  - 0.017% fail on Leaks
- 0.051% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.034% fail on ABS (83% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Parking brake
  - 0.017% fail on Condition
2.0% fail on Driver's view of the road (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Wipers (71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.017% fail on Bonnet
- 0.017% fail on Mirrors
0.39% fail on Registration plates and VIN
- 0.39% fail on Registration plate
0.32% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
- 0.29% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
  - 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  - 0.017% fail on Passengers airbag
- 0.034% fail on Seat belts (87% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.034% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
0.26% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions
- 0.068% fail on Fuel system
  - 0.068% fail on System
- 0.051% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
0.086% fail on Steering (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Steering system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.034% fail on Steering arm
  - 0.017% fail on Track rod end
- 0.017% fail on Steering operation
- 0.017% fail on Locking devices
0.086% fail on Road Wheels (72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Attachment
0.051% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Body condition
- 0.017% fail on Doors
  - 0.017% fail on Passengers front
- 0.017% fail on Load security
  - 0.017% fail on Access panel