MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Audi » TT » 2010

Audi TT MOT Results

Registered in 2010
79.4% pass rate
from 6,855 tests in 2020
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.

  • 6.0% fail on Suspension (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Ball joint dust cover (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joints (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 1.2% fail on Springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Coil springs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Coil spring (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.82% fail on Shock absorbers (39% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.13% fail on Suspension arms (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.029% fail on Pins and bushes (98% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.044% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.029% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.015% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.029% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.015% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres (15% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Size/type (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 5.2% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Position lamps (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Position lamp (36% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Headlamps (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Headlamp (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.073% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.99% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Direction indicators (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Flashing type (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Individual direction indicators (85% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.48% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Reversing lamps (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Reversing lamps (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Electrical equipment (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.029% fail on Horn (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.2% fail on Brakes (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.20% fail on Brake discs and drums (80% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.20% fail on Brake discs (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.015% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Service brake performance (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Rbt (49% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.70% fail on Service brake performance (49% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.044% fail on Decelerometer (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (86% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.073% fail on Parking brake performance (88% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Rbt (90% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance (92% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.029% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.029% fail on Rbt (sp) (93% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.029% fail on Service brake imbalance (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.073% fail on Anti-lock braking system (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.015% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.073% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.029% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (90% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Pedal
    • 0.015% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.015% fail on Lever
    • 0.015% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.015% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
  • 2.6% fail on Visibility (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Washers (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.90% fail on Wipers (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.10% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.10% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.044% fail on Driver's view
  • 1.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (43% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.32% fail on Catalyst emissions (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.28% fail on Compression ignition (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.015% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.015% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.029% fail on Fluid leaks (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Engine oil leaks (80% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.45% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.45% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.45% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (38% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.029% fail on Seat belts (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.029% fail on Condition (91% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.39% fail on Body, chassis, structure (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.073% fail on System
      • 0.029% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.015% fail on Tank
    • 0.10% fail on Transmission (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Drive shafts (94% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.058% fail on Joints (95% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.029% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.015% fail on Joints
        • 0.015% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.088% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.044% fail on Doors
      • 0.029% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.015% fail on Door condition
        • 0.015% fail on Hinge
      • 0.015% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.015% fail on Door condition
    • 0.029% fail on Body
      • 0.015% fail on Mounting fixings
      • 0.015% fail on Other body component
    • 0.015% fail on Seats
      • 0.015% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.058% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Steering (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.058% fail on Steering linkage components (96% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Track rod end (97% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.029% fail on Steering play
      • 0.029% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.015% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.015% fail on Steering rack
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages