Audi TT MOT Results
Registered in 201085.2% pass rate
from 5,847 tests in 2017
(49% better than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Audi TT is unusually good or bad.
-
5.3% fail on
Tyres
(22% better than other 2010 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition (27% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Valve stem
- 0.051% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.051% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(67% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (58% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Position lamps
(57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Front lamps (62% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.82% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Headlamps
(77% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Headlamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Headlamp levelling device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.068% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.017% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.43% fail on
Direction indicators
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Side repeaters (50% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Individual lamps (82% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Flashing type
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.36% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.21% fail on Registration plate lamp (94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Horn
- 0.017% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.017% fail on Rear reflectors
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.086% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.74% fail on
Coil springs
(78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.72% fail on Condition (78% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Location
-
0.63% fail on
Shock absorbers
(40% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Condition (40% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Wheel bearings
(73% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Front
-
0.051% fail on
Suspension arms
(96% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (97% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
0.051% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Front drive shafts
(93% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.034% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.034% fail on Condition
-
0.017% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.017% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.017% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(30% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Brakes
(56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
(46% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Brake pads (43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Brake discs (69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Brake linings
- 0.017% fail on Brake calipers
-
0.84% fail on
Brake performance
(61% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Rear wheels (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Front wheels (57% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Brake performance not tested (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Parking brake performance (89% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.017% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.21% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.10% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.068% fail on
Components
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.068% fail on Hoses
- 0.017% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.017% fail on Leaks
-
0.068% fail on
Components
(84% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.051% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.034% fail on ABS (83% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.017% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.017% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Hub components
(46% better than other 2010 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Washers (43% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Wipers (71% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Windscreen
- 0.017% fail on Bonnet
- 0.017% fail on Mirrors
-
0.39% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.39% fail on Registration plate
-
0.32% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.27% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.017% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.034% fail on
Seat belts
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Condition (86% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.26% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(82% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Emissions
-
0.068% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.068% fail on System
- 0.051% fail on Exhaust system (95% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.086% fail on
Steering
(92% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.051% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.034% fail on Steering arm
- 0.017% fail on Track rod end
- 0.017% fail on Steering operation
- 0.017% fail on Locking devices
-
0.051% fail on
Steering system
(94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Road Wheels
(72% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Attachment
-
0.051% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(85% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.017% fail on Body condition
-
0.017% fail on
Doors
- 0.017% fail on Passengers front
-
0.017% fail on
Load security
- 0.017% fail on Access panel
Read the Honest John Review